Anaerobic Threshold in Stand-up Paddle: Comparison Between Direct and Alternative Methods

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH(2022)

引用 3|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Balikian, P, Gomes de Araujo, G, Prado, ES, Ryan Geraldes, AA, Marinho de Lima, AH, and Mendes, EV. Anaerobic threshold in stand-up paddle: comparison between direct and alternative methods. J Strength Cond Res 36(7): 1896-1900, 2022-The purpose of this study was to test the validity of alternative protocols, mean velocity during 30 minutes of continuous effort (V30min) and critical velocity (CV), to estimate the anaerobic threshold in stand-up paddle (SUP). Eight athletes performed: 3 maximal efforts at 400-, 500-, and 800-m distances to determine CV values, using the distance-time relationship; 3 efforts at 85, 90, and 100% of maximal 500-m effort to determine the velocity related to 3.5 mmol center dot L-1 of lactate, assumed as the onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA) and; a 30-minute continuous effort to determine the V30min. All evaluations were separated by 48 hours, with the athletes using their own boards and paddles in the water. No differences were observed between the OBLA (2.35 +/- 0.13 m center dot s(-1)) and alternative methods (CV: 2.42 +/- 0.20 m center dot s(-1); p = 0.10 and V30min: 2.32 +/- 0.13 m center dot s(-1); p = 0.63). Although strong correlations were observed between the OBLA and alternative methods (CV: r = 0.84 and V30min: r = 0.94), the limits of agreement were higher in CV (+/- 0.23 m center dot s(-1)) than V30min (+/- 0.08 m center dot s(-1)). These results demonstrate that both the CV and V30min are valid to estimate the OBLA. In view of the specificity of SUP and the high levels of agreement, the use of the V30min is recommended to prescribe training intensities.
更多
查看译文
关键词
performance, aerobic capacity, critical velocity, 30-minute continuous effort
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要