谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Gemcitabine Plus Concurrent Irreversible Electroporation Vs Gemcitabine Alone For Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES(2020)

引用 5|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUNDLocally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE.AIMTo compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC.METHODSFrom February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors.RESULTSThere were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS.CONCLUSIONGemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Irreversible electroporation, Gemcitabine, Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, Overall survival, Progression free survival, Prognostic factors
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要