Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic and open lunate excisions in the cadaveric wrist

Background: In advanced Kienbock disease, unreconstructible lunate should be excised as a salvage procedure. There is a lack of information about the biomechanical approaches evaluating the carpal kinematics after lunate excision. We hypothesized that arthroscopic lunate excision would not break the ring structure of the proximal carpal row, preventing carpal instability. We aimed to investigate changes in carpal kinematics following arthroscopic and open lunate excisions. Methods: We used upper extremities from five fresh cadavers and simulated arthroscopic and open lunate excisions. Arthroscopic lunate excision was performed to preserve the attachment sites of intrinsic and extrinsic carpal ligaments to the lunate. Open lunate excision was conducted with sectioning of the intrinsic and extrinsic carpal ligaments. Using a three-dimensional space electromagnetic tracking device, rotation angles of the scaphoid and triquetrum and the change of scaphotriquetrum distance were measured under axial loading. We compared the rotation angles and the change of scaphotriquetrum distance among intact wrists, open, and arthroscopic lunate excisions. Findings: No Significant differences in the rotation angle of the scaphoid and triquetrum or the change of scaphotriquetrum distance were found between intact wrist and arthroscopic lunate excision. The triquetrum significantly dorsiflexed and supinated in wrists with open lunate excisions compared with intact wrists. Significant differences in the change of scaphotriquetrum distance were found between intact and openly excised wrists and between arthroscopic and open excisions. Interpretation: Arthroscopic lunate excision potentially prevented kinematic change of the proximal carpal row under axial loading by maintaining the integrity of attachment sites of carpal ligaments.