Nuclear Restart Politics: How The 'Nuclear Village' Lost Policy Implementation Power

The March 2011 nuclear accident (3.11) shook Japan's nuclear energy policy to its core. In 2012, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) returned to government with a pro-nuclear policy and the intention to swiftly restart nuclear power plants. In 2020, however, only six nuclear reactors were in operation. Why has the progress of nuclear restarts been so slow despite apparent political support?This article investigates the process of restarting nuclear power plants.The key finding is that the 'nuclear village', centered on the LDP Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry, and the nuclear industry, which previously controlled both nuclear policy goal-setting and implementation, remained in charge of policy decision making i.e. goal-setting but lost policy implementation power to an extended conflict over nuclear reactor restarts.The main factors that changed the politics of nuclear reactor restarts are Japan's new nuclear safety agency, the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), and a substantial increase in the number of citizens' class-action lawsuit against nuclear reactors.These findings highlight the importance of assessing both decision making and implementation in assessments of policy change.