Repeat hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an average treatment effect analysis

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver with high rates of recurrence post-resection. Repeat hepatectomy (RH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the mainstays for managing recurrent HCC following initial curative resection. This retrospective study aims to determine the average treatment effect of RH and RFA in patients with recurrent HCC. Patients and methods From 2000 to 2016, a total of 219 consecutive patients with recurrent HCC who underwent either RH or RFA were included in the study. The analysis was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and propensity score-matched (PSM) methods. Results The minor and major post-operative morbidity after propensity score-matched analysis for the RH group was 30.0% and 6.0%, respectively, and 19.2% and 0.0% ( p = 0.1006), respectively, for the RFA group. After propensity score matching, the median OS for RH and RFA was 85.5 (IQR, 33.5–not reached) and 53.3 months (IQR, 27.5–not reached) ( p = 0.8474), respectively. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between both groups ( p = 0.1287). RH showed improved long-term overall survival over RFA at the third [71.3% versus 65.7% ( p = 0.0432)], fifth [59.9% versus 45.4% ( p = 0.0271)] and tenth [35.4% versus 32.2% ( p = 0.0132)] year follow-up, respectively. Median time to recurrence was 11.1 (IQR, 5.0–33.2) and 28.0 months (IQR, 9.1–not reached) ( p = 0.0225) for the RFA and RH group, respectively. Conclusions RH confers a late survival benefit compared with RFA for patients with recurrent HCC despite a higher morbidity rate.