A Comparison Study Of Single- And Multiple-Target Stimulation Methods For Eliciting Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials

2021 10TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER)(2021)

引用 0|浏览8
暂无评分
摘要
A visual stimulator plays an important role in a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interface (BCI). In conventional BCI studies, SSVEPs have been elicited by either a single stimulus whose flickering frequency varies across trials or multiple stimuli flickering at different frequencies simultaneously. It has been implicitly assumed that the SSVEPs generated by the single- and multiple-target stimulation methods are comparable. However, no study has directly compared their efficacy in eliciting SSVEPs. This study, therefore, performed a quantitative comparison of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and classification accuracy using 4-class SSVEPs generated by these two methods. The classification accuracy was estimated by three commonly-used target identification algorithms including calibration-free canonical correlation analysis (CCA)-based method and template-based methods with CCA- and task-related component analysis (TRCA)-based spatial filters. The results showed that the single-target stimulation method led to significantly higher SNR and classification accuracy than its multi-target counterpart.
更多
查看译文
关键词
steady-state visual evoked potentials,visual stimulator,steady-state visual evoked potential-based braincomputer interface,SSVEP,conventional BCI studies,single stimulus whose flickering frequency varies,multiple stimuli,single- target stimulation methods,multiple-target stimulation methods,eliciting SSVEPs,signal-to-noise ratio,classification accuracy,4-class SSVEPs,target identification algorithms,template-based methods,task-related component analysis-based spatial filters,single-target stimulation method,multitarget counterpart
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要