Flow Diversion in Acute Sub Arachnoid Haemorrhage: A Single Centre Five Year Experience

Objectives: The role of flow-diversion in acute sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is controversial. Many of the published data warns of high rates of procedure-related complications and aneurysmal rebleed. This study evaluates the safety, efficacy, clinical and angiographic outcomes of acute flow-diversion at our institute. Methods: The institutional database from June 2015 to June 2020 was retrospectively reviewed for aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) treated with flow diversion. Clinical presentation, procedural details, complications, anti-platelet usage, rebleeding and aneurysm occlusion rates and outcomes were recorded. Results: 22 (59% females; median age 56 years) consecutive patients were identified. None of them were on regular antiplatelets/anticoagulation in the 15-days preceding the treatment. The mean aneurysm diameter was 5.4 mm and the median delay to flow-diversion was 2 days. Almost 73% (16/22) of patients had adjunctive coiling in the same session. There was no aneurysmal rebleed at a median follow up of 8.5 months and 86.3% (19/22 patients) had good clinical outcomes (3-month MRS 0-2). Adverse events related to the flow diversion procedure were seen in 3 patients; none of them had a medium to long-term clinical consequence. Three patients died from complications of SAH, unrelated to the procedure. Vascular imaging follow-up was available for 20 patients and the complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 95%. Conclusion: Flow diversion could be a reasonably safe and effective technique for treating ruptured aneurysms in appropriately selected patients when conventional options of surgical clipping and coiling are considered challenging.