Safety and efficacy of intravascular therapy in patients with progressive stroke caused by intracranial large vascular occlusion exceeding the time window of 24 hours

Purpose To compare endovascular and drug therapies for efficacy and safety in patients with a progressive stroke caused by intracranial large vascular occlusion exceeding the time window of 24 hours. Patients and methods A total of 58 patients with progressive stroke caused by large intracranial vascular occlusion exceeding the time window of 24 hours treated in the stroke center of our hospital for three years were retrospectively analyzed . According to the applied therapy, 58 patients were divided into the endovascular (n = 19) and drug (n = 39) therapy groups. Then, modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates, mortality rates and adverse events were assessed in both groups within 90 days. Results The 90-day good prognosis rate was significantly higher in the endovascular therapy group compared with the drug group (68.4% VS 38.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.92; P = 0.032). The 90-day NIHSS scores were lower in the endovascular therapy group compared with the drug group (3.3 +/- 2.6 VS 5.2 +/- 3.0, OR = -1.89; 95%CI, -3.50 to -0.27; P = 0.023). Meanwhile, the proportion of patients with a Barthel index of 90-100 was significantly higher in the endovascular therapy group compared with the drug group (53.0% VS 25.6%, OR = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.10-0.98; P = 0.042). Finally, both groups showed similar rates of adverse events. Conclusion In patients with progressive stroke caused by large intracranial vascular occlusion exceeding 24 hours, endovascular therapy probably results in improved efficacy at 90 days compared with drug therapy, without increasing the rates of adverse effects.