Diagnostic performance of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system for detecting muscle-invasive bladder cancer in real clinical settings: Comparison with diagnostic cystoscopy

Purpose We herein compared the diagnostic performance of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scoring with diagnostic cystoscopy and evaluated diagnostic accuracies based on tumor locations. Materials and Methods Among 112 bladder cancer patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and diagnostic cystoscopy preoperatively to detect bladder cancer, 61 were analyzed. VI-RADS was categorized into 5 stages by 2 radiologists (R1 and R2). Cut-off values ≥3 indicated muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Muscle invasion (MI) was visually evaluated using diagnostic cystoscopy by 2 urologists (U1 and U2). The sensitivity and specificity of VI-RADS scores and diagnostic cystoscopy for diagnosing MI were compared. Results 16 patients (26.2%) were pathologically diagnosed with MIBC. Regarding MI diagnostic accuracy, the sensitivity/specificity of VI-RADS scores were 93.8/88.9% by R1 and 87.5/86.7% by R2, while those of diagnostic cystoscopy were 56.3/68.9% by U1 and 68.8/84.4% by U2. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of VI-RADS was significantly higher than that of cystoscopy, particularly for tumors located on the bladder neck, trigone, dome, and posterior and anterior walls. Over- and under-diagnosis rates were higher with VI-RADS than with diagnostic cystoscopy (25.9% vs. 14.8%) for tumors located on the lateral wall or ureteral orifice. Conclusion VI-RADS had superior diagnostic performance for detecting MI, especially in tumors located at the bladder neck/trigone/dome/posterior and anterior wall. However, VI-RADS was inferior to cystoscopy in terms of MI detection for tumors located on the lateral wall or ureteral orifice. Therefore, a combination of diagnostic tools is recommended for the accurate staging of these tumors.