谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Comparison of Polarimetric Filters to Retrieve Forest Biomass.

2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS(2021)

引用 0|浏览16
暂无评分
摘要
There are several polarimetric filters in the literature developed for the most diverse applications. Here, we present an evaluation of different filter sizes and types for improving the AGB estimates in the Brazilian Amazon, varying from none to 21×21 px filter size in full polarimetric ALOS/PALSAR-2. The optimal window size was chosen by the highest coefficient of determination (R2) between forest AGB and backscattering coefficient (σ°). After that, six polarimetric filters were evaluated: BoxCar, Refined Lee, Improved Sigma Lee, Intensity Driven Adaptive Neighbourhood (IDAN), Scattering Model-Based (SMB), and Model-based (MB). The comparison criterion was a set of statistics aimed at preserving the three basic principles of the filtering process. The optimal window size was 11×11 px. The best was Refined Lee, followed by BoxCar and SMB. The R2 differences in the filter choice can be up to 15% for retrieving forest AGB.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Amazon,Polarimetry,ALOS/PALSAR-2,Aboveground Biomass,Speckle
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要