Minimal clustering and species delimitation based on multi-locus alignments vs SNPs: the case of the Seriphium plumosum L. complex (Gnaphalieae: Asteraceae)

We applied species delimitation methods based on the Multi-Species Coalescent (MSC) model to 500+ loci derived from genotyping-by-sequencing on the South African Seriphium plumosum (Asteraceae) species complex. The loci were represented either as multiple sequence alignments or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and analysed by the STACEY and Bayes Factor Delimitation (BFD)/SNAPP methods, respectively. Both methods supported species taxonomies where virtually all of the 32 sampled individuals, each representing its own geographical population, were identified as separate species. Computational efforts required to achieve adequate mixing of MCMC chains were considerable, and the species/minimal cluster trees identified similar strongly supported clades in replicate runs. The resolution was, however, higher in the STACEY trees than in the SNAPP trees, which is consistent with the higher information content of full sequences. The computational efficiency, measured as effective sample sizes of likelihood and posterior estimates per time unit, was consistently higher for STACEY. A random subset of 56 alignments had similar resolution to the 524-locus SNP data set. The STRUCTURE-like sparse Non-negative Matrix Factorisation (sNMF) method was applied to six individuals from each of 48 geographical populations and 28023 SNPs. Significantly fewer (13) clusters were identified as optimal by this analysis compared to the MSC methods. The sNMF clusters correspond closely to clades consistently supported by MSC methods, and showed evidence of admixture, especially in the western Cape Floristic Region. We discuss the significance of these findings, and conclude that it is important to a priori consider the kind of species one wants to identify when using genome-scale data, the assumptions behind the parametric models applied, and the potential consequences of model violations may have. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.