RAPID VS. LATE RE-TRANSPLANTATION FOR EARLY KIDNEY GRAFT LOSS

Abstract Background and Aims Early graft failure (EGL) is a devastating complication of kidney transplantation. Patients with EGL have an increased risk of mortality of up to twelve times compared to patients who received grafts that survive beyond 30 days. Moreover, they may have become sensitized to antigens from the failed graft and that human leukocyte antigen antibodies (anti-HLA), identified on single antigen bead assays, may not be reliable until several weeks after transplantation. Thus, if rapid re-transplantation occurs, there is no certainty regarding the recipient's immunological status. Hence, there could be an increased immunological risk with the consequent disturbance of the new graft's survival. Method We performed a retrospective single-center observational study in re-transplanted patients with EGL (defined as graft loss before 30 days from transplant) between January 1977 and November 2019 from our center to analyze the outcomes of rapid re-transplantation (occurred within 30 days of EGL) vs late re-transplantation (occurred beyond those 30 days). Results: T here were 82 re-transplants after EGL. The median overall patient survival after re-transplantation was 32 years. Eight patients died within the first year. Among the mortality causes, there were four septic shocks, one cardiogenic shock, one massive pulmonary thromboembolism, one myocardial infarction, and one unknown cause. When analyzed for periods, death censored graft survival was 89% at one and five years after re-transplantation. One graft was lost at eight days due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), while there was one death with a functioning graft three months after re-transplantation secondary to a pulmonary embolism. Seventy-three late re-transplants occurred. When analyzed for periods, death censored graft survival was 81% and 69% at one and five years after re-transplantation, respectively. The median patient survival after late re-transplantation was 32 years. There were fewer deaths after rapid re-transplantation than late re-transplantation, but given the small number of cases in the former, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.3). There was no association between the timing of re-transplantation and an increased risk of graft failure (HR 0.30 [0.04 – 2.2]). While four rapid re-transplants did not share any incompatibilities between donors, four did share at least one HLA type I incompatibility, and one shared an incompatibility of HLA class I and class II. There were no T-cell mediated rejections (TCMR), and there was only one AMR in the rapid rapid re-transplantation group, whereas there were six TCMRs and fifteen AMRs in the late re-transplantation group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.4, respectively). Conclusion Rapid re-transplantation appears to be safe and does not entail increased rejection risk, nor it diminishes long-term graft survival when compared to late re-transplantation.