The Selection of Feasible Strategies Based on Consistency Measurement of Cliques

Few studies of conflict analysis have analyzed conflict situations from the perspective of the consistency degree of cliques. Quantifying the conflict degree is instructive for weakening or resolving conflicts. In this paper, we propose the improved Pawlak model of conflict analysis, a common consistency measurement is introduced to quantify the consistency degree of cliques, which explains the internal causes of conflict situation from a new perspective. In addition, the proposed consistency measurement reflects the fit between feasible strategy and clique, which inspires us to formulate the criteria for selecting feasible strategies in a three-valued situation table. Moreover, considering that many-valued ratings are more powerful and effective to describe vague information, a novel model of fuzzy conflict analysis is established with a fuzzy conflict function and a fuzzy consistency measurement in a fuzzy situation table, which could degenerate into the improved Pawlak model of conflict analysis. The criteria of selecting feasible strategies is illustrated by an NBA labor negotiation. Finally, the performance of proposed models is compared with other advanced models.