Efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with placebo and salazosulfapyridine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study

Masako Hara,Tohru Abe, Sachiko Sugawara,Yutaka Mizushima, Keiko Hoshi, Shoichiro Irimajiri,Hiroshi Hashimoto, Shinichi Yoshino,Nobuo Matsui,Masashi Nobunaga,Shigeyuki Nakano

Modern Rheumatology(2007)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract We conducted a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of iguratimod in 376 Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and safety of the drug with those of placebo and salazosulfapyridine. In the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate, iguratimod was superior to placebo (53.8% versus 17.2%; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001) and was not inferior to salazosulfapyridine (63.1% versus 57.7%, 95% confidence interval for the rate difference, −7.9% to 18.7%). Iguratimod began exhibiting its therapeutic effect within 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment and was effective even in patients who had a poor response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No statistically significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse reactions between iguratimod and salazosulfapyridine. The study results suggest that iguratimod could become a new option for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
更多
查看译文
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis,active rheumatoid arthritis,salazosulfapyridine,iguratimod,double-blind,parallel-group
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要