Interactive comment on “The Impact of CCN Concentrations on the Thermodynamic and Turbulent State of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds” by Jan Chylik et al

The topic of the presented study is highly interesting and the title is quite intriguing. However, when reading and trying to understand the study and the results, I am not impressed. The manuscript is in quite a bad state with lots of repetition, spelling errors, poor quality figures, missing figure etc. This is a misuse of the time of a reviewer. In the current state, it is not possible to review the science and I therefore recommend rejection of this manuscript. I hope the authors take the time to do a thorough rewrite, I am happy to review it again provided it is presented with the details and explanations that is needed to assess the quality and validity of the work performed. Below I illustrate my decision with some examples, they are far from exhaustive though.