Corrigendum to ‘Towards a new definition of decompensated cirrhosis’ [J Hepatol 76 (2022) 202–207]

It has come to our attention that there is an error in the Introduction of our manuscript. The sentence (starting bottom line, left column of the first PDF page), ‘However, the combination of ascites, bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy and jaundice, associated or not with other signs, was included in the definition in 80% of studies.’ should read, ‘However, any combination of ascites, bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy and jaundice, associated or not with other signs, was included in the definition in 80% of studies.’ We ask our readers to note this important distinction and we apologise for any inconvenience caused.