Remote ischemic postconditioning has a detrimental effect and remote ischemic preconditioning seems to have no effect on small intestinal anastomotic strength.

BACKGROUND:The effect of remote pre- and postconditioning on anastomotic healing has been sparsely studied. The aim of our study was to investigate whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) applied before and after the creation of a small bowel anastomosis had an effect on anastomotic healing on postoperative day five evaluated by a tensile strength test and histological analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-two female piglets were randomized into two groups. The intervention group (n = 12) received RIC on the forelimbs consisting of 15 min of ischemia followed by 30 min of reperfusion before the first end-to-end ileal anastomosis was created. The RIC procedure was repeated and the second and more distal anastomosis was performed. The control group (n = 10) had two similar anastomoses with similar time intervals but without RIC. On postoperative day five, the anastomoses were subjected to macroscopic evaluation, tensile strength test and histological examination. RESULTS:Mean tensile strength when the first transmural rupture appeared (MATS-2) was significantly lower in the first anastomosis in the intervention group compared to the control group (11.4 N vs 14.7 N, p < .05). Similar result was found by the maximal strength (MATS-3) as defined by a drop in the load curve (12.3 N vs 15.9 N, p < .05). Histologically, a significantly higher necrosis score was found in the anastomosis in the intervention group (1.4 vs 0.8, p < .05). No other significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS:In conclusion, post-anastomotic remote ischemic conditioning had a detrimental effect and pre-anastomotic conditioning seems to have no effect on small intestinal anastomotic strength.