Philosophical Issues in (Sub)Disciplinary Contexts: The Case of Quantum Chemistry

IN A WAY, QUANTUM chemistry was “born” as a philosophical problem: It was, of course, chemistry, but owed its scientific status to physics; it was physics with the promise of explaining all of chemistry. Thankfully, following P. A. M. Dirac’s verdict (1929), this state of affairs, at least some years after 1929, was for a future world, an almost utopian world. In the meantime, chemists, physicists, and mathematicians for about half a century defying Dirac’s soothing call that all is well, but only on principle, brought about a new subdiscipline and all the methodological, epistemological, and philosophical problems that go along with the formation of any subdiscipline. In this chapter we put forward a proposal as to how we can write the history of an “in-between” discipline such as quantum chemistry, suggesting that this proposal can be extended to other “in-between” disciplines. Then, we address the role of theory in chemistry, and specifically in quantum chemistry, including the issues surrounding the ontological status of theoretical entities, and proceed to discuss the implications of the introduction of computers in quantum chemistry and the concomitant reconceptualization of experiment. Finally, we reappraise the question of reductionism from the perspective of the practitioners of quantum chemistry. From the very beginning of the period when chemical problems were examined quantum mechanically, everyone involved in the subsequent developments tried to understand the chemical character of what was begotten in the encounter(s) of chemistry with quantum mechanics. Was quantum chemistry the subdiscipline for all those chemical problems formulated in the language of physics which could be dealt with by a straightforward application of quantum mechanics with, of course, the ensuing conceptual readjustments? Was it the case that chemical problems could be dealt with only through an intricate process of appropriation of quantum mechanics by the chemists’ culture? Furthermore, the development of quantum chemistry brought about new entities whose ontological status was continuously under negotiation: exchange energy, resonance, and orbitals were some of the more intriguing entities.