Association of individual surgeon volume and postoperative outcome in esophagomyotomy for achalasia

Background Many surgical disciplines have demonstrated superior outcomes when procedures are performed at “high-volume”. Esophagomyotomy is commonly performed for achalasia, however it’s unclear what constitutes “high-volume” for this procedure, and if individual procedure volume and outcome are related. We identified physicians performing esophagomyotomy, stratified them by individual case volume, and examined their outcomes with the hypothesis that high-volume surgeons will be associated with improved outcomes as compared to low-volume surgeons. Methods The 2015–2019 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) inpatient dataset was queried for esophagomyotomy. Surgeons who performed ≥ 10 procedures during the study period were placed into the high-volume cohort, and those performing < 10 into the low-volume cohort. Groups were compared by length of stay, discharge disposition, and postoperative complications. Patient demographics were evaluated using student’s t test and chi square test, p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Six hundred and sixty-two procedures performed by 135 surgeons were identified. The mean number of esophagomyotomies per surgeon was 4.9 (Range 1–147). The high-volume group ( n = 12) performed 362 of the 662 procedures (55%), while the low-volume group ( n = 123) performed the remaining 300 (45%). Patients of high-volume physicians had decreased length of stay (1.4 ± 0.8 days vs 4.9 ± 6.7 days, p = 0.01) and were more likely to be discharged to home following surgery (92.8% vs 86.0, p = 0.04). High volume physicians also had statistically significant differences in rates of urinary tract infection (1.4% vs 4.0%, p = 0.034), postoperative malnutrition (5.8% vs 11.0%, p = 0.015), and postoperative fluid and electrolyte disorders (5.5% vs 13.3%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion Surgeons who perform higher volumes of esophagomyotomies are associated with decreased length of stay, higher likelihood of patient discharge to home, and decreased rates of some postoperative complications. This research should prompt further inquiry into defining what constitutes a high-volume center in foregut surgery and their role in improving patient outcomes.