Deciphering the fate of sulfate in one- and two-chamber bioelectrochemical systems

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA(2022)

引用 8|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Treatment of wastewaters with high concentration of sulfate before discharge is an environmental imperative. However, current technologies are often highly energy-and chemical-demanding. Recently, microbial electrochemical technologies (MET) have been proposed as an alternative and more sustainable approach for the treatment of wastewaters rich in sulfate. Here we compare the sulfate reduction performance of one-and two-chamber reactors. In two-chamber reactors, sulfate reduction to sulfide was achieved with high electron recovery efficiency (83.9 +/- 1.3%) at a sulfate reduction rate of 9.7 +/- 2.6 mg SO42- L-1 d(-1) cm(-2), whereas in one-chamber reactors apparently no sulfate reduction took place. Non electrochemical microcosm experiments suggested that sulfate reduction in two-chamber reactors was driven by the availability of cathodically produced H-2 . In one-chamber reactors, the presence of anodically produced O-2 presumably resulted in chemical short circuit including aerobic hydrogen oxidation, abiotic and biotic re-oxidation of sulfide to sulfate. Microbial community analysis demonstrated that sulfate reduction was mainly performed by sulfate reducing prokaryotes (SRP) belonging to the genera Desulfomicrobium and Desulfovibrio, whereas sulfide oxidizing bacteria (SOB) (mainly Acinetobacter and Sulfuricurvum) could be responsible for re-oxidation of sulfide. Thus, fundamental and application-oriented research on microbial electrochemical sulfate reduction ought to be studied in two-chamber reactors for avoiding a potential bias of results by anodic reactions. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Bioelectrochemical systems,Microbial electrochemical technologies,Hydrogen-mediated electron uptake,Mixotrophic sulfate reduction,Sulfur cycle
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要