谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Verifying the Predictive Performance for Soil Organic Carbon when Employing Field Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Satellite Imagery Obtained Using Two Different Sampling Methods

Computers and electronics in agriculture(2022)

引用 3|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
In soil research, the most employed sampling design techniques can be categorized as random sampling (stratified or simple random (SR)) or systematic techniques (transects or grid). Many other sampling approaches have also been developed by researchers based on these sampling principles. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in SOC prediction when using field spectra (FS) and Sentinel-2 (S2) data collected separately through SR and grid design (GD) on the same agricultural field. Additionally, the impact of spectral indices on S2 data in a merged data approach under the two-sampling strategies will also be tested. The data for each sampling method were obtained based on a previous study in which 130 soil samples were collected from a full grid design (with 40 m spacing) covering the entire area. Although the full GD method was used for this current study, the distance between the samples was increased (80 m apart). The schemes were therefore structured for the collection of 65 samples in the field for each sampling technique. However, 63 samples were collected with the GD because two of the sampling points fell on rocky areas and were eliminated accordingly. For SR sampling, the study field was not stratified, and no requirements were used for minimum sample spacing. Sixty-five samples and spectral data were collected at various locations. To achieve the mentioned objective, this study builds a fivefold cross-validation model based on support vector machines (SVMs). Different pretreatment combinations were also implemented. The results showed that the GD was better than the SR approach using the merged dataset (R-CV(2) = 0.45, RMSECV = 0.26, RPD = 1.41, bias =-0.0073); however, SOC prediction under SR sampling using FS yielded the highest accuracy and lowest error margin (R-CV(2) = 0.60, RMSECV = 0.21, RPD = 1.66, and bias = 0.0045). Despite the above-mentioned disparity between the single and merged data, this study shows that using different sampling design methods on the same field separately is a very promising approach for SOC estimation, particularly in fields with low SOC. Based on these results, the robustness of this approach should be investigated next in future studies using larger sample sizes as well as other modeling techniques. Based on these results, the robustness of this approach should be investigated next in future studies using larger sample sizes as well as other modeling techniques.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Sampling design,Soil organic carbon (SOC),Agricultural soil,Spatial variability,Pretreatment
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要