Shared control versus traded control in driving: A debate around automation pitfalls.

JCF de Winter,SM Petermeijer,DA Abbink

Ergonomics(2022)

引用 5|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
A major question in human-automation interaction is whether tasks should be traded or shared between human and automation. This work presents reflections-which have evolved through classroom debates between the authors over the past ten years-on these two forms of human-automation interaction, with a focus on the automated driving domain. As in the lectures, we start with a historically informed survey of six pitfalls of automation: 1. Loss of situation and mode awareness, 2. Deskilling, 3. Unbalanced mental workload, 4. Behavioral adaptation, 5. Misuse, and 6. Disuse. Next, one of the authors explains why he believes that haptic shared control may remedy the pitfalls. Next, another author rebuts these arguments, arguing that traded control is the most promising way to improve road safety. This article ends with a common ground, explaining that shared and traded control outperform each other at medium and low environmental complexity, respectively.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Human-automation interaction,automated driving,driverless cars,function allocation,human factors,human-robot interaction,shared control,traded control
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要