Comparison of Sheares vaginoplasty, vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft and laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative, anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS), undergoing Sheares vaginoplasty, vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft or laparoscopic peritoneal (Davydov) vaginoplasty. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 117 patients with MRKHS undergoing creation of a neovagina from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Comparisons between continuous variables were performed using Student’s t -test and between qualitative variables using chi-squared tests. Results The operative time, return of bowel activity and return to work were the longest in the laparoscopic Davydov group ( P < 0.001). The total cost was the highest in the SIS graft group ( P < 0.001). The length of the neovagina was 7.9 ± 1.2 cm in the Sheares group, 7.1 ± 0.8 cm in the SIS graft group and 8.1 ± 1.1 cm in the laparoscopic Davydov group. The difference in the length of the neovagina was significant ( P < 0.001). There was significant difference in the duration of continuous mould wearing ( P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the total female sexual function index (FSFI) scores or in the satisfaction scores of the male partner among the three groups. Conclusion Sheares vaginoplasty and the vaginoplasty using SIS graft caused less trauma and provided similar functional results to laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty. However, the patients in the Sheares group and SIS graft group needed to wear the mould for a longer duration post-surgery. Sheares vaginoplasty can provide a valuable and economic alternative method for the creation of a neovagina in patients with MRKHS.