Treatment Efficacy Score—continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials

M Marczyk,A Mrukwa,C Yau, D Wolf,Y-Y Chen, R Balassanian,R Nanda, B A Parker, G Krings,H Sattar, J C Zeck,K S Albain, J C Boughey,M C Liu,A D Elias, A S Clark, S J Venters, S Shad, A Basu, S M Asare,M Buxton, A L Asare,H S Rugo, J Perlmutter, A M DeMichele,D Yee,D A Berry,L Van't Veer,W F Symmans,L Esserman,L Pusztai

Annals of Oncology(2022)

引用 10|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
•We developed a statistical tool to compare two RCB distributions giving a single metric named Treatment Efficacy Score (TES).•TES identifies a regimen with a higher pCR rate and also captures the downstaging effects of treatment on residual cancer.•TES correlates with event-free and distant recurrence-free survival better than pCR rate difference.•TES could serve as a better early surrogate for trial arm level survival than pCR rate difference.•We created a free web tool (http://dssoftware.aei.polsl.pl/TES/TES/) to plot RCB distributions and calculate TES statistic.
更多
查看译文
关键词
breast cancer,neoadjuvant chemotherapy,residual cancer burden
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要