Surgical Strategies for Patients with Second Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lesions 2 Cm or Less in Diameter

The wide application of low-dose computed tomography (CT) has led to an increase in the detection of small lung cancer lesions. Moreover, surgical recommendations for second primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions ≤ 2 cm are obscure. This study compares the efficacy of wedge resection, lobectomy, and segmentectomy for small second primary NSCLC lesions. The cohort was established based on the SEER database. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) values were applied to identify prognostic factors. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to plot the survival curves of the different subgroups according to propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to then compare the therapeutic efficacy of the surgical procedures. A total of 568 patients were enrolled in this study. Age, sex, grade, and lymph node ratio were selected as independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in survival probabilities among the groups of patients who underwent segmentectomy, wedge resection, or lobectomy (p > 0.05). We also established a nomogram model based on the four prognostic factors to guide clinical treatment. Based on the findings of our study, segmentectomy was more appropriate than lobectomy for patients with a second primary NSCLC lesion ≤ 2 cm in diameter. The evidence to support other recommendations is insufficient.