AdVance and AdVance XP Male Sling Comparison, an Institutional Experience

Introduction

The AdVance male sling has been used for many years for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with multiple previous studies evaluating its efficacy. More recently, a new generation AdVance XP was designed with modifications in its design and surgical tools in hopes to improve patient outcomes.

Objective

The aim of our study was to provide our institution's outcomes comparing objective and patient-reported outcomes of the AdVance male sling to the AdVance XP.

Methods

All patients who have had placement of an AdVanceXP male urethral sling were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included the necessity of one year post-operative follow up. We then identified a comparative cohort who had the most recent placement of the AdVance sling. We compared patient demographics, baseline characteristics, functional outcomes, voiding studies and complications.

Results

A total of 11 patients who received the AdVanceXP were compared to 11 patients who received the AdVance male sling. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline demographics between the two groups (Table1). When comparing the AdVance XP to Advance, there was no difference in change in average flow rate (-1.26mL/s vs -5mL/s, p=0.476) or peak flow (-5.11mL/s vs -5.73mL/s, p=.936). Patient's pre-surgical pad usage was greater in the AdVanceXP than the AdVance sling groups (2.64 vs 1.60, p=0.019). The mean decrease in pad usage was 1.95 pads in those with the AdVanceXP compared to 1.36 pads with the AdVance (p=.227). There were no statistically significant differences in operative times between the AdVanceXP and the AdVance male sling (64.5min vs 68.8min, p=.249). Both groups had one patient who had issues with post-operative pain and neither group had any patients with post-operative retention, infection or need for reoperation within one year.

Conclusions

Patient's who had placement of the AdVanceXP were found to have a greater reduction in pad usage when compared to the AdVance sling, though not reaching statistical significance.

Disclosure

No