谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Stage Ct3 Low Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Prognostic Factors

Journal of gastrointestinal oncology(2022)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Whether all cT3 low rectal cancer patients should receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains controversial. The depth of invasion beyond the muscularis propria of the cT3 rectal cancer is of great significance to the selection of a treatment plan and the evaluation of prognosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 187 patients with stage cT3 low rectal cancer, who had been treated at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from June 2010 to December 2012. The patients were divided into the nCRT group (88 cases) and no-nCRT group (99 cases). Possible significant prognostic factors [i.e., primary tumor volume (PTV), cell differentiation, circumferential resection margin (CRM), nCRT, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lymph node status, surgical procedure, etc.] were collected for estimation of disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastases rate (DM), local recurrence rate (LR). Independent predictive factors or survival were determined using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The mean PTV was 16.2 +/- 11.1 (2.07-72.68) cm(3). In the univariate and multivariate analyses: nCRT hazards ratio (HR) =4.258, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.912-9.483 (P<0.001); PTV HR =0.381, 95% CI: 0.181-0.804 (P=0.011); CRM HR =0.227, 95% CI: 0.097-0.532 (P=0.001). For the PTV <= 15 cm(3) group, there were no significant differences between the nCRT and no-nCRT group in 3-year follow-up (P>0.05). For the PTV >15 cm(3) group, there were significant differences between the nCRT and no-nCRT group in 3-year DFS (84.2% vs. 51.1%; P=0.001), DM (13.1% vs. 31.2%; P=0.017) and LR (2.9% vs. 26.6%; P=0.009). For the CRM negative group, there were significant differences between the nCRT and no-nCRT group in 3-year DFS (94.0% vs. 79.0%; P=0.008), LR (1.5% vs. 10.7%; P=0.028) and DM (4.5% vs. 13.5%; P=0.039). Conclusions: For stage cT3 low rectal cancer patients, nCRT, PTV, and CRM were independent prognostic factors. NCRT may improve the survival of PTV >15 cm(3) patients, but may not have a significant effect on patient with PTV <= 15 cm(3) and CRM negative. Direct surgery is recommended for this group of patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Tumor volume,low rectal cancer,T3 stage,neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT),prognosis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要