Differential effects of first-line IFX and conventional treatment on inflammatory serum proteins of paediatric moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease patients

M. Jongsma, L. M. M. Costes,I. Tindemans, M. A. Cozijnsen, R. H. C. Raatgeep,M. van Pieterson,Y. Li,J. C. Escher,L. de Ridder, J. N. Samsom

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS(2021)

引用 0|浏览7
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract Background Recently, we established that First-line infliximab (FL-IFX) was superior to conventional treatment (CONV) in achieving and maintaining clinical remission in newly diagnosed paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD) (PMID: 33384335). Selection of patients eligible for FL-IFX can be corroborated by combining clinical criteria with immunological biomarkers relating to the patients’ underlying immunopathology. Therefore, we investigated differential effects of FL-IFX and CONV induction treatment on serum inflammatory protein concentrations and assessed whether stratification of CD patients according to baseline serum profiles of IFX-modulated proteins relates to maintaining remission at week 52. Methods In the TISKIDS randomised controlled trial, newly diagnosed therapy-naïve CD patients with a weighted paediatric CD activity index (wPCDAI) >40 were included. FL-IFX consisted of 5 IFX infusions (5 mg/kg) combined with azathioprine (AZA) maintenance treatment. CONV treatment consisted of induction therapy with Exclusive Enteral Nutrition or oral prednisolone combined with AZA maintenance. Serum samples of 48 FL-IFX and 43 CONV patients, collected at time of diagnosis and after 10–14 weeks of induction treatment, were available. Concentrations of 92 inflammatory proteins were determined with Olink Proteomics® proximity extension technology. Hierarchical clustering was performed to stratify patients according to their serum immune profiles. Clinical disease remission was defined as wPCDAI<12.5. Results At baseline, prior to therapy, clinical disease characteristics and serum inflammatory protein concentrations did not significantly differ between FL-IFX and CONV treated patients. After 10–14 weeks, FL-IFX reduced 28 proteins and enhanced 2 proteins while CONV treatment reduced 13 proteins and enhanced 1 protein. Eighteen proteins were differentially regulated by FL-IFX only. Hierarchical clustering of patients based on their baseline profiles of the 30 IFX-modulated proteins revealed 2 patient clusters. The CD-hi cluster had an increased abundance of 24/30 proteins amongst which Oncostatin-M, TNFSF14, HGF and TGF-alpha and higher clinical inflammatory parameters compared to the CD-lo cluster. Crucially, both baseline inflammatory protein profile and type of induction therapy significantly determined whether patients reached clinical disease remission without treatment escalation at week 52; with CD-hi patients having the lowest change. Conclusion FL-IFX achieves stronger reduction and modulates more proteins than CONV treatment. Stratification of patients according to profiles of IFX-modulated proteins discerns patients with a lower chance of reaching clinical remission without treatment escalation at week 52.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要