Clinical results following colonic resection for ulcerative colitis in elderly individuals (elderly-onset vs. nonelderly onset)

Background The incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, but there are few reports comparing elderly UC patients undergoing colectomy for elderly-onset UC (EO) and nonelderly-onset UC (NEO). The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between EO and NEO patients who underwent UC-related surgery. Methods We identified 1973 patients with UC who underwent colectomy at Hyogo College of Medicine between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 2018. Only patients aged 65 years old and older who underwent colectomy were enrolled in this study (n = 221, 11.2%), and their clinical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age at disease onset: those with onset at younger than 60 years old (NEO) and at 60 years old or older (EO). Results In the 221 UC patients who underwent colectomy at 65 years old or older, there were 155 cases of EO and 66 cases of NEO. The main surgical indication in NEO patients was colitis-associated cancer/dysplasia (32/66, 47%). In contrast, refractory to medical treatment was the leading cause of surgery in EO patients (80/155, 52%). The distributions of surgical indications were different between the two groups (p < 0.01). The preoperative daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the EO group than in the NEOgroup (0 mg vs. 10 mg, p < 0.01). The rates of immunosuppressant, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab use did not differ significantly between the groups. Significantly more patients underwent emergency surgery in the EO group than in the NEO group (14% vs. 35%, p < 0.01). The proportions of patients with postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) were 17.4% (27/155) in the EO group and 13.6% (9/66) in the NEO group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.48). The prognosis of the EO patients who underwent UC-related emergency surgery was worse than that of the NEO patients (p < 0.01). In the EO group, 8 (14.8%) of 54 patients died within 30 postoperative days, while there were no deaths in the NEO group. Conclusion Among elderly UC patients undergoing UC-related surgery, EO patients undergoing emergency surgery had very poor outcomes, and the mortality rate was 14.8%. In such cases, it is important for physicians and surgeons to begin communication at an early stage so that the optimal surgical timeframe is not missed.