Comparison of two malaria multiplex immunoassays that enable quantification of malaria antigens

Background Immunoassay platforms that simultaneously detect malaria antigens including histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)/HRP3 and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), are useful epidemiological tools for rapid diagnostic test evaluation. This study presents the comparative evaluation of two multiplex platforms in identifying Plasmodium falciparum with presence or absence of HRP2/HRP3 expression as being indicative of hrp2/hrp3 deletions and other Plasmodium species. Moreover, correlation between the malaria antigen measurements performed at these platforms is assessed after calibrating with either assay standards or international standards and the cross-reactivity among Plasmodium species is examined. Methods A 77-member panel of specimens composed of the World Health Organization (WHO) international Plasmodium antigen standards, cultured parasites for P. falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi , and clinical specimens with mono-infections for P. falciparum , Plasmodium vivax , and Plasmodium malariae was generated as both whole blood and dried blood spot (DBS) specimens. Assays for HRP2, P. falciparum –specific pLDH ( Pf LDH), P. vivax –specific pLDH ( Pv LDH), and all human Plasmodium species Pan malaria pLDH (PanLDH) on the Human Malaria Array Q-Plex and the xMAP platforms were evaluated with these panels. Results The xMAP showed a higher percent positive agreement for identification of hrp2 -deleted P. falciparum and Plasmodium species in whole blood and DBS than the Q-Plex. For whole blood samples, there was a highly positive correlation between the two platforms for Pf LDH (Pearson r = 0.9926) and Pv LDH ( r = 0. 9792), moderate positive correlation for HRP2 ( r = 0.7432), and poor correlation for PanLDH ( r = 0.6139). In Pearson correlation analysis between the two platforms on the DBS, the same assays were r = 0.9828, r = 0.7679, r = 0.6432, and r = 0.8957, respectively. The xMAP HRP2 assay appeared to cross-react with HRP3, while the Q-Plex did not. The Q-Plex Pf LDH assay cross-reacted with P. malariae , while the xMAP did not. For both platforms, P. knowlesi was detected on the Pv LDH assay. The WHO international standards allowed normalization across both platforms on their HRP2, Pf LDH, and Pv LDH assays in whole blood and DBS. Conclusions Q-Plex and xMAP show good agreement for identification of P. falciparum mutants with hrp2/hrp3 deletions, and other Plasmodium species. Quantitative results from both platforms, normalized into international units for HRP2, Pf LDH, and Pv LDH, showed good agreement and should allow comparison and analysis of results generated by either platform.