Abstract 1540: CARs and TCRs: Myth and reality

Cancer Research(2021)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract Here we address questions of comparative TCR and CAR function: How different are CARs from TCRs with regard to antigen sensitivity, selectivity, co-stimulation dependence, checkpoint control, cytokine sensitivity, and antigen-dependent exhaustion (defined as loss of cytotoxicity and proliferative capacity over time). We used optimized CARs and TCRs matched to the same target pMHCs, allowing direct comparison of these important parameters. We describe a large-scale, systematic comparison of 17 CARs and 5 TCRs directed at 5 different pMHC targets in both acute and chronic settings in vitro. Surprisingly, we find little fundamental difference between CARs and TCRs with respect to their relative sensitivity to known regulators of T cell activation, including co-stimulation, checkpoint, and cytokine control. Though TCRs often emerge from human blood directly as potent, selective receptors, CARs must be heavily optimized to attain these properties for pMHC targets. Nonetheless, when iteratively improved, CARs can achieve levels of sensitivity and selectivity similar to their vaunted counterparts. Thus, other than signaling sensitivity (and perhaps selectivity), there may be little to distinguish CARs from TCRs in the context of engineered-cell therapy. CARs appear similar to TCRs with regard to immune control, undermining the notion that CARs can, of themselves, overcome regulators that limit T cell activity. Nevertheless, CARs tolerate much more sequence variability within their structural components and this, coupled with their capability to bind different antigen classes, smaller size and subunit simplicity, confers advantages that may foster a leading role for CARs in the next generation of cell therapeutics. We believe that the major conclusions reached here should instruct thinking about the boundaries around therapeutic designs for CARs, which appear to be very wide, and those around differentiation from TCRs, which appear to be much narrower. Citation Format: Xueyin Wang, Aaron D. Martin, Kathleen Negri, Michele McElvain, Julyun Oh, Ming-Lun Wu, Wen-Hua Lee, Agnes Hamburger, Han Xu, Alexander Kamb. CARs and TCRs: Myth and reality [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1540.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要