Comparisons Between modified PTCY and G-CSF/ATG Regimens for Haploidentical Transplantation in Patients with Aplastic Anemia

• Haploidentical HSCT with the modified PTCY or ATG/G-CSF regimen in AA demonstrated similar survival outcomes and incidence of GVHD. • ATG/G-CSF regimen resulted in more rapid neutrophil engraftment and mPTCY regimen showed lower incidence of TRM. : Haploidentical transplantation has become an alternative treatment option for aplastic anemia patients without matched sibling donors or matched unrelated donors. Recently, the post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) regimen and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG) regimen have become the most common protocols used worldwide. : We designed this retrospective study to compare the outcomes of patients receiving a modified post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (mPTCY) regimen versus the G-CSF/ATG regimen. : We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical data of 130 aplastic anemia patients who underwent haplo-HSCT and received the mPTCY regimen (n=55) or G-CSF/ATG regimen (n=75) between Jan 2013 and Jun 2021 across seven transplant centers. : Neutrophil engraftment was successful in all patients within 30 days in the G-CSF/ATG group. The cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate in the mPTCY group was 96.36% (95% CI, 94.57-97.57, P =0.010). The median time of neutrophil engraftment in the G-CSF/ATG group was 10 (7-28) days, which was more rapid than that observed in the mPTCY group ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD) between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of II-IV acute GVHD was 18.40% (95% CI, 4.27-40.31) in the mPTCY group and 19.32% (95% CI, 5.86-38.58) in the G-CSF/ATG group, while the cumulative incidence of III-IV acute GVHD was 7.31% (95% CI, 0.09-37.48) in the mPTCY group and 7.57% (95% CI, 0.20-34.19) in the G-CSF/ATG group. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS). The 2-year OS, FFS and GRFS rates were 95.91% (95% CI, 84.59-98.96), 92.25% (95% CI, 80.59-97.03) and 86.68% (95% CI, 73.98-93.44), respectively, in the mPTCY group and 86.67% (95% CI, 76.64-92.59), 81.28% (95% CI, 70.45-88.46) and 77.20% (95% CI, 65.89-85.16), respectively, in the G-CSF/ATG group. The transplantation-related mortality (TRM) rate was significantly higher in the G-CSG/ATG group than in the mPTCY group (13.33% in the G-CSG/ATG group versus 1.96% in the mPTCY group, P =0.022). In multivariate analysis, female donors, a higher hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and III-IV aGVHD were associated with worse survival outcomes. : In conclusion, the mPTCY and G-CSF/ATG regimens led to similar outcomes in AA patients, but quicker engraftment was observed with the ATG/G-CSF regimen, and a lower incidence of TRM was observed with the mPTCY regimen.