Correction to: Postmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalities

Background Postmortem computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have been gradually introduced to forensic pathology centres over the past two decades, with varying results in comparison to autopsy. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of postmortem CT in determining a cause of death in children who died of unnatural causes. Materials and methods This was a prospective recruitment of 30 children (< 18 years) who underwent postmortem CT and a forensic autopsy. A cause of death was independently assigned by two experienced paediatric radiologists and compared to that of the forensic autopsy. Results A correct cause of death was assigned by reviewers 1 and 2 in 70% ( n = 21/30) and 67% ( n = 20/30) of cases, respectively. For gunshot injuries and blunt force head injuries, there was 91% ( n = 10/11) and 100% ( n = 6/6) agreement between forensic autopsy and both reviewers, respectively. No cause of death could be assigned by reviewers 1 and 2 in 27% ( n = 8) and 30% ( n = 9) of cases, respectively. An incorrect cause of death was assigned by both reviewers in one case (3%). The Cohen Kappa level of agreement between the forensic autopsy and reviewers 1 and 2 was k = 0.624 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–0.80, P = 0) and k = 0.582 (95% CI 0.41–0.76, P = 0), respectively. There was near perfect agreement between reviewers 1 and 2 (k = 0.905) (95% CI 0.78–1.00, P = 0). Conclusion Postmortem CT has good diagnostic accuracy for identifying a cause of death related to trauma, but it has poor accuracy for children dying from causes not associated with apparent physical injury.