Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT- PCR) on Self-Collected Nasal Swab Compared With Professionally Collected Nasopharyngeal Swab

Nusrat Mannan,Ruksana Raihan, Ummey Shahnaz Parvin,Sheikh Mohammad Fazle Akbar,Md Selim Reza,Shafiqul Islam, Joy Kundu, Abdullah Al Noman,Md Fakhruddin, Muttasim Billaha, Moniruzzaman Anik, Tanzil Hasan,Nikhil Tudu, Abdur Rahim,Farzana Mim,Mohammad Jahidur Rahman Khan

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE(2022)

引用 1|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Self-collection of nasal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) would considerably increase the testing capability and decrease the risk of transmission among healthcare workers (HCW) and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of self-collected nasal swabs compared with professionally collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR. Materials and methods: We performed a cross-sectional study where the suspected cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were instructed about the self-collection of nasal swabs from their mid-turbinate. The results were compared to a nasopharyngeal swab collected by a trained healthcare worker in the same patient at the same sitting. Results: We enrolled 100 participants, of which, 69 (69%) were male and 31 (31%) were female. The median age of the study participant was 36 years. Of the participants, 58 (58%) were symptomatic, and the commonest clinical presentation was cough, which was present in 42 (42%) participants. Out of 100 samples, 31 (31%) professionally collected nasopharyngeal swabs and 28 (28%) self-collected nasal swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Out of 31 professionally collected positive samples, three samples were negative in self-collection. Out of 28 self-collected positive samples, no sample was negative in the professional collection. The sensitivity and specificity of self-collected nasal swabs compared to professionally collected nasopharyngeal swabs were 90.32% and 100.00%, respectively. The sensitivity of self-collected nasal was 100% when the cycle threshold (Ct) value of the professionally collected NP swab was less than 30. Conclusion: Our study showed that self-collected nasal swabs' sensitivities were similar to professionally collected NP swabs with a high viral load (low Ct value). Hence, this method could be used when the patient is symptomatic and come to the health providers in the early stage of COVID-19 illness.
更多
查看译文
关键词
rt-pcr, nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, covid-19, sars-cov-2, self-collection
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要