US Navy Ship-Based Disaster Response: Lessons Learned

Tamara J. Worlton, Alfred F. Shwayhat,Michael Baird, Daryl Fick, Kyle D. Gadbois,Shane Jensen,Matthew D. Tadlock

Current Trauma Reports(2022)

引用 5|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose of Review The US Navy has a long history of responding to disasters around the globe. US Navy ships have unique characteristics and capabilities that determine their capacity for a disaster response. This paper discusses common considerations and lessons learned from three distinct disaster missions. Recent Findings The 2010 earthquake in Haiti had a robust response with multiple US Navy ship platforms. It was best assessed in three phases: an initial mass casualty response, a subacute response, and a humanitarian response. The 2017 response to Hurricane Maria had a significant focus on treating patients with acute needs secondary to chronic illnesses to decrease the burden on the local healthcare system. The COVID-19 response brought distinctive challenges as it was the first mission where hospital ships were utilized in an infectious disease deployment. Summary The first ships to respond to a disaster will need to focus on triage and acute traumatic injury. After this first phase, the ship’s medical assets will need to focus on providing care in a disrupted health care system which most often includes acute exacerbations of chronic disease. Surgeons must be ready to be flexible in their responsibilities, be competent with end-of-life care, and negotiate technical and cultural communication challenges.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Disaster medicine, Military surgery, Military ships, Hospital ships, Humanitarian surgery, Military medicine
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要