An Assessment of the 10-Item Mental Health Recovery Measure in a Predominantly African American Sample of Adults with Serious Mental Illness

Study objectives were to 1) assess the reliability and validity of the 10-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM-10) in sample of predominately African American participants with serious mental illness, and 2) evaluate differences in MHRM-10 scores between the present sample and two other samples of persons with serious mental illness with different racial compositions. Participants included 230 adults (85.7% African American) with chart diagnoses of schizophrenia-spectrum, bipolar-spectrum, and major depressive disorders receiving services from community mental health centers in Detroit, Michigan. In addition to the MHRM-10, participants completed measures of psychological symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)- General Severity Index (GSI) and depression subscale), well-being (12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0; WHODAS 2.0), and stress-related growth (Stress-Related Growth Scale – Short Form; SRGS-SF). Internal consistency and convergent validity of the MHRM-10 were examined. Differences in MHRM-10 scores between the present sample and other samples were characterized by effect sizes. The MHRM-10 demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity of the MHRM-10 included moderate correlations with the BSI-GSI, BSI-depression subscale, SRGS-SF, and WHODAS 2.0. The present sample of predominately African American participants showed higher MHRM-10 scores than two other samples with smaller proportions of African American participants. The MHRM-10 demonstrates excellent internal consistency and good convergent validity among African Americans with serious mental illness. Although findings are promising, studies should further assess the psychometric properties of the MHRM-10 in African American samples. Additional research that examines racial differences in mental health recovery is needed.