Clinical trial and translational research for cancer immunology in Asian countries: Understanding the new frontier.

e14510 Background: Among the major advances in cancer treatment is the progress in cancer immunotherapy; however, despite the strides, there is few information specific to the Asian population. It is unclear to what extent clinical trial and translational research in cancer immunology are conducted in Asian institutions. Methods: This questionnaire-based survey was conducted among researchers and healthcare professionals who are involved in cancer immunology research and therapeutics in Asia-Pacific countries. The study identified the involvement of respondents in various phases of clinical trials, and immunotherapy research. In addition, the current capabilities of the institutions to conduct translational research were surveyed. Results: We received a total of 122 responses from 20 Asia-Pacific countries. More than half (58%) of the responders are currently conducting clinical trials on cancer immunology with 25% having performed more than 10 Phase 3 trials in the last 3 years. In clinical trials and clinical practice, immune checkpoint inhibitors were performed in most countries (81.8% and 88.6%, respectively). Clinical trials and clinical practice of CAR-T and TCR-T were performed only in some countries (CAR-T; 22.7% and 15.9%, TCR-T; 2.3% and 0%, respectively). In the absence of novel therapeutics in their institution, 18% of the responders refer their patient to facilities that have ongoing clinical trials. Among the institutions that perform Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (55.1%), the most common type offered include autologous (81.3%) and allogenic (70.8%) peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation. About 51.7% of the respondents have institutions that can conduct early drug phase development studies with only 11.2% capable of utilizing their own immunotherapeutic agents. Less than half of the respondents (40.7%) belong to institutions that have conducted translational researches using patient-derived samples for the last three years. Furthermore, more than half of the respondent institutions have no personnel that is experienced to handle and/or run patient-derived fresh peripheral blood or fresh tumors. Collaboration among neighboring countries can allow send out of specimens to other institutions that have such capability, however, 56.9% of countries have regulations or restrictions in transporting lymphocytes or tumor tissues. Conclusions: Oncologists and researchers in Asia recognize the importance of cancer immunology researches for patients. There were institutional and inter-country differences particularly in the conduct of early phase clinical drug development and translational research.