Preparation, characterization and biological properties of a novel bone block composed of platelet rich fibrin and a deproteinized bovine bone mineral

Alveolar bone defects caused by tooth loss often lead to challenges in implant dentistry, with a need for development of optimal bone biomaterials to predictably rebuild these tissues. To address this problem, we fabricated a novel bone block using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM), and characterized their mechanical and biological properties. The bone block was prepared by mixing DBBM, Liquid-PRF, and Solid-PRF fragments in various combinations as follows: (1) BLOCK-1 made with Solid-PRF fragments + DBBM, (2) BLOCK-2 made with Liquid-PRF + DBBM, (3) BLOCK-3 made with Solid-PRF fragments + Liquid-PRF + DBBM. The time for solidification and the degradation properties were subsequently recorded. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and tensile tests were carried out to investigate the microstructure and mechanical properties of each block. The bioactivity of the three groups towards osteoblast differentiation was also evaluated by culturing cells with the conditioned medium from each of the three groups including cell proliferation assay, cell migration assay, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, and alizarin red staining (ARS), as well as by real-time PCR for genes encoding runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), ALP, collagen type I alpha1(COL1A1) and osteocalcin (OCN). BLOCK-3 made with Solid-PRF fragments + Liquid-PRF + DBBM had by far the fastest solidification period (over a 10-fold increase) as well as the most resistance to degradation. SEM and tensile tests also revealed that the mechanical properties of BLOCK-3 were superior in strength when compared to all other groups and further induced the highest osteoblast migration and osteogenic differentiation confirmed by ALP, ARS and real-time PCR. PRF bone blocks made through the combination of Solid-PRF fragments + Liquid-PRF + DBBM had the greatest mechanical and biological properties when compared to either used alone. Future clinical studies are warranted to further support the clinical application of PRF bone blocks in bone regeneration procedures.