BgRT Motion Management Maintains Target Dose Coverage for Respiratory and Non-Respiratory Motion

Purpose/Objective(s) Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) uses outgoing emissions after administration of an injected radiotracer to dynamically guide the delivery of radiation treatment to PET-avid targets. In this study, we evaluated the tracking performance of FDG-guided BGRT for two potential types of motion management (respiratory and non-respiratory (gastrointestinal)) while exploring different target shapes: spherical and non-spherical. BgRT is designed to ensure target coverage while keeping organ-at-risk (OAR) doses low. Materials/Methods A large custom anthropomorphic phantom with 2 robotic articulating arms was used to place a target and organ-at-risk inside a 27-liter water filled cavity. The targets consisted of an integrated ion chamber inside a 3D printed 22 mm sphere or a small non-spherical ovoid shape filled with FDG. The hot FDG-filled OAR consisted of either a 3D printed large C-shape annulus (mimicking a heart), large ovoid (mimicking a kidney), or a 30 mm sphere, all with integrated ion chambers. Both the 3D printed target and the OAR were filled with an 8:1 concentration ratio versus the water background. Three different 10 Gy/fraction treatment plans with two different target shapes and realistic nearby OARs were created with a 5 mm margin added to the CTV to generate the PTV. 3D printed targets and OARs were loaded with EBT-XD radiographic film. A 3D elliptical motion trajectory with breathing induced hysteresis with a maximum amplitude of +/- 12 mm was used for the respiratory motion model. An asymmetric slow-moving drift waveform with long-step shifts of +13/-5mm mm was used for the non-respiratory (gastrointestinal) motion model. Dosimetric results were evaluated based on 2-dimensional comparisons between measured film and planned dose distributions for the target and OAR. BgRT must maintain a prescription dose margin greater than 2 mm on the CTV for the three different motion experiments. Also, ion-chamber point dose and maximum film dose on the OAR must be within bounds predicted by the treatment planning system. Results BgRT was able to meet minimum margin requirements (a margin loss < 3mm) and meet prescription dose coverage in both motion management scenarios while maintaining OAR dose limits within the plan predicted bounds (see Table 1). Conclusion BgRT is able to provide motion management in complex cases that is agnostic to the type of motion. BgRT is able to maintain the PTV coverage with less than 3 mm reduction from the original 5mm margin.