Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population: Skeletal Immaturity Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes but Demonstrates Increased Rate of Subsequent Knee Injury

PurposeTo evaluate short- to mid-term-outcomes, including instability rates, following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in skeletally immature versus mature pediatric patients.MethodsPatients younger than age 18 with recurrent patellar instability who underwent primary allograft MPFL reconstruction by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2019 were identified. Skeletally immature patients underwent all-epiphyseal drilling and mature patients underwent metaphyseal drilling at the Schöttle’s point. Patients 1 year from surgery were contacted to complete questionnaires, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee score. Further data included chart and imaging review. Significance was determined by P < .05.ResultsOf 118 eligible patients, 88 completed questionnaires. There were 67 skeletally mature and 21 skeletally immature patients. The mature group was older (15 vs 13 years, P < .001), predominantly female (67 vs 43%, P = .046), and heavier (24.7 vs 18.9, P < .001). Trochlear dysplasia (P = .594), concomitant procedures (P = .336), graft choice (P = .274), and follow-up length (P = .107) did not differ, although mature patients more often underwent suture tape augmentation (68 vs 13%, P < .001). Immature patients had greater rates of ipsilateral injury (35 vs 16%, P = .043); redislocation rate did not differ (9 vs 3%, P = .225). Mature patients were more likely to respond “definitely yes or probably yes” when asked if they would undergo the same care if needed (96 vs 76%, P = .007). At minimum 2-year follow-up, subsequent ipsilateral injury rates did not differ, although willingness to undergo the same care remained significant (95 vs 69%, P = .010). In a multivariable elimination logistic regression model, skeletal maturity was the only variable associated with subsequent ipsilateral injury (P = .049).ConclusionsPediatric patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction have good and comparable outcomes regardless of skeletal maturity. However, younger age and lack of tape augmentation in skeletally immature patients may predispose them to subsequent injury.Level of EvidenceIII, case-control study. To evaluate short- to mid-term-outcomes, including instability rates, following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in skeletally immature versus mature pediatric patients. Patients younger than age 18 with recurrent patellar instability who underwent primary allograft MPFL reconstruction by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2019 were identified. Skeletally immature patients underwent all-epiphyseal drilling and mature patients underwent metaphyseal drilling at the Schöttle’s point. Patients 1 year from surgery were contacted to complete questionnaires, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee score. Further data included chart and imaging review. Significance was determined by P < .05. Of 118 eligible patients, 88 completed questionnaires. There were 67 skeletally mature and 21 skeletally immature patients. The mature group was older (15 vs 13 years, P < .001), predominantly female (67 vs 43%, P = .046), and heavier (24.7 vs 18.9, P < .001). Trochlear dysplasia (P = .594), concomitant procedures (P = .336), graft choice (P = .274), and follow-up length (P = .107) did not differ, although mature patients more often underwent suture tape augmentation (68 vs 13%, P < .001). Immature patients had greater rates of ipsilateral injury (35 vs 16%, P = .043); redislocation rate did not differ (9 vs 3%, P = .225). Mature patients were more likely to respond “definitely yes or probably yes” when asked if they would undergo the same care if needed (96 vs 76%, P = .007). At minimum 2-year follow-up, subsequent ipsilateral injury rates did not differ, although willingness to undergo the same care remained significant (95 vs 69%, P = .010). In a multivariable elimination logistic regression model, skeletal maturity was the only variable associated with subsequent ipsilateral injury (P = .049). Pediatric patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction have good and comparable outcomes regardless of skeletal maturity. However, younger age and lack of tape augmentation in skeletally immature patients may predispose them to subsequent injury.