Reducing Use of Coagulation Tests in a Family Medicine Practice Setting: an Implementation Study

IntroductionClinicians often order the international normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) to evaluate for the possibility of inherited bleeding disorders despite sensitivities and specificities of 1%-2%. The most accurate tool to evaluate for bleeding disorders is a validated bleeding assessment tool (BAT). Our aim was to reduce coagulation testing by >50% in a large family practice in Ontario, Canada. MethodsWe conducted an implementation study from May 2016 to February 2020. Iterative interventions included introduction of a validated BAT into the electronic medical record (EMR); removal of the APTT as a prepopulated selection from the laboratory requisition; and education targeting family medicine teams and laboratory personnel. The primary outcome was the rate of pre- and post-APTT testing. Creatinine testing was the control. Data were analyzed via an interrupted time series analysis using Stata 13. ResultsImmediately following education of the laboratory personnel on coagulation testing, the APTT rate level dropped by 1.26 tests per 100 patient visits per month (p < 0.001) and was sustained until the end of the study. Meanwhile, the PT/INR and creatinine testing rate levels did not change (rate level = -0.02 per 100 visits per month, p = 0.79 and 0.49, p = 0.22 respectively). There was good uptake of the BAT following integration and 18/88 (20%) obtained a referral to hematology after BAT completion. ConclusionsMultidisciplinary, iterative interventions reduced APTT testing and enabled the use of BATs to guide hematology referrals in a large family practice.