Diagnostic Performance and Patient Outcomes With C-Reactive Protein Use in Early-Onset Sepsis Evaluations.

OBJECTIVES:To determine performance of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnosis of early-onset sepsis, and to assess patient outcomes with and without routine use of CRP. STUDY DESIGN:This was a retrospective cohort study of infants admitted to 2 neonatal intensive care units. CRP was used routinely in early-onset sepsis evaluations during 2009-2014; this period was used to determine CRP performance at a cut-off of ≥10 mg/L in diagnosis of culture-confirmed early-onset sepsis. Routine CRP use was discontinued during 2018-2020; outcomes among infants admitted during this period were compared with those in 2012-2014. RESULTS:From 2009 to 2014, 10 134 infants were admitted; 9103 (89.8%) had CRP and 7549 (74.5%) had blood culture obtained within 3 days of birth. CRP obtained ±4 hours from blood culture had a sensitivity of 41.7%, specificity 89.9%, and positive likelihood ratio 4.12 in diagnosis of early-onset sepsis. When obtained 24-72 hours after blood culture, sensitivity of CRP increased (89.5%), but specificity (55.7%) and positive likelihood ratio (2.02) decreased. Comparing the periods with (n = 4977) and without (n = 5135) routine use of CRP, we observed lower rates of early-onset sepsis evaluation (74.5% vs 50.5%), antibiotic initiation (65.0% vs 50.8%), and antibiotic prolongation in the absence of early-onset sepsis (17.3% vs 7.2%) in the later period. Rate and timing of early-onset sepsis detection, transfer to a greater level of care, and in-hospital mortality were not different between periods. CONCLUSIONS:CRP diagnostic performance was not sufficient to guide decision-making in early-onset sepsis. Discontinuation of routine CRP use was not associated with differences in patient outcomes despite lower rates of antibiotic administration.