Three-dimensional real and virtual models in fetal surgery: a real vision

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & GynecologyVolume 63, Issue 3 p. 303-311 Opinion Three-dimensional real and virtual models in fetal surgery: a real vision O. O. Okpaise, O. O. Okpaise orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-6258 Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, HungarySearch for more papers by this authorG. Tonni, G. Tonni orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-7486 Prenatal Diagnostic Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Neonatology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorH. Werner, H. Werner orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-7293 Biodesign Lab DASA/PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorE. Araujo Júnior, E. Araujo Júnior orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-2532 Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil Medical School, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul (USCS), Bela Vista Campus, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Lopes, J. Lopes orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-8291 Biodesign Lab DASA/PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorR. Ruano, Corresponding Author R. Ruano [email protected] [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-5858 Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA Maternal–Fetal–Children Service of Excellence, Americas Group, United Health Care Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence. (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected])Search for more papers by this author O. O. Okpaise, O. O. Okpaise orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-6258 Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, HungarySearch for more papers by this authorG. Tonni, G. Tonni orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-7486 Prenatal Diagnostic Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Neonatology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorH. Werner, H. Werner orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-7293 Biodesign Lab DASA/PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorE. Araujo Júnior, E. Araujo Júnior orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-2532 Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil Medical School, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul (USCS), Bela Vista Campus, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Lopes, J. Lopes orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-8291 Biodesign Lab DASA/PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorR. Ruano, Corresponding Author R. Ruano [email protected] [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-5858 Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA Maternal–Fetal–Children Service of Excellence, Americas Group, United Health Care Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence. (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected])Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 December 2022 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26148Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Open Research DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. REFERENCES 1Werner Jr H, Santos JL, Belmonte S, Ribeiro G, Daltro P, Gasparetto EL, Marchiori E. Applicability of three-dimensional imaging techniques in fetal medicine. Radiol Bras 2016; 49: 281–287. 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0100 PubMedGoogle Scholar 2Farmer D. Fetal surgery. BMJ 2003; 326: 461–462. 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.461 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Ruano R, Vega B. Fetal surgery: how recent technological advancements are extending its applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16: 643–645. 10.1080/17434440.2019.1641404 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4Pedreira DAL. Advances in fetal surgery. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2016; 14: 110–112. 10.1590/S1679-45082016MD3449 PubMedGoogle Scholar 5Deka D, Dadhwal V, Gajatheepan SB, Singh A, Sharma KA, Malhotra N. The art of fetoscopy: a step toward minimally invasive fetal therapy. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2012; 62: 655–659. 10.1007/s13224-012-0232-y PubMedGoogle Scholar 6Farrell J, Howell LJ. An overview of surgical techniques, research trials, and future directions of fetal therapy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2012; 41: 419–425. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01356.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7Sacco A, Van der Veeken L, Bagshaw E, Ferguson C, Van Mieghem T, David AL, Deprest J. Maternal complications following open and fetoscopic fetal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39: 251–268. 10.1002/pd.5421 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8Benson CB, Doubilet PM. The History of Imaging in Obstetrics. Radiology 2014; 273: 92–110. 10.1148/radiol.14140238 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9Rubesova E, Barth RA. Advances in Fetal Imaging. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31: 567–576. 10.1055/s-0034-1371712 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10Hopkins LM, Feldstein VA. The Use of Ultrasound in Fetal Surgery. Clin Perinatol 2009; 36: 255–272. 10.1016/j.clp.2009.03.009 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11Whitworth M, Bricker L, Mullan C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Systemuc Rev 2015: 2015: CD007058. PubMedGoogle Scholar 12Torrents-Barrena J, Piella G, Masoller N, Gratacós E, Eixarch E, Ceresa M, Ballester MÁG. Segmentation and classification in MRI and US fetal imaging: Recent trends and future prospects. Med Image Anal 2019; 51: 61–88. 10.1016/j.media.2018.10.003 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13Nawapun K, Phitkwatchara N, Jaingam S, Viboonchart S, Mongkolchat N, Wataganara T. Advanced ultrasound for prenatal interventions. Ultrasonography 2018; 37: 200–210. 10.14366/usg.18011 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14Timor-Tritsch IE, Platt LD. Three-dimensional ultrasound experience in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 569–575. 10.1097/00001703-200212000-00001 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15Saleh AM, Al-Saygh F, Abushama M, Ahmed B. The Role of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Gynecology. Research on Women's Health 2019 1: 4. 10.24983/scitemed.rwh.2019.00103 Google Scholar 16Huang Q, Zeng Z. A Review on Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Imaging Technology. BioMed Res Int 2017; 2017: 6027029. 10.1155/2017/6027029 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17Merz E, Pashaj S. Advantages of 3D ultrasound in the assessment of fetal abnormalities. J Perinat Med 2017; 45: 643–650. 10.1515/jpm-2016-0379 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18Ruano R, Martinovic J, Dommergues M, Aubry M-C, Dumez Y, Benachi A. Accuracy of fetal lung volume assessed by three-dimensional sonograph. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 725–730. 10.1002/uog.2624 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19Ruano R, Aubry M-C, Barthe B, Dumez Y, Zugaib M, Benachi A. Three-dimensional sonographic measurement of contralateral lung volume in fetuses with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36: 273–278. 10.1002/jcu.20430 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20Ruano R, Takashi E, da Silva MM, Campos JADB, Tannuri U, Zugaib M. Prediction and probability of neonatal outcome in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia using multiple ultrasound parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 42–49. 10.1002/uog.10095 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21Ruano R. Fetal Organ Volume Measurements by Three-dimensional Ultrasonography in Clinical Practice. DSJUOG 2015; 9: 397–407. 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1426 Google Scholar 22Kim SH, Choi BI. Three-dimensional and Four-dimensional Ultrasound: Techniques and Abdominal Applications. J Med Ultrasound 2007; 15: 228–242. 10.1016/S0929-6441(08)60040-5 Google Scholar 23Kim SR, Won P, Lee R, Kin A. Four-dimensional ultrasound guidance of prenatal invasive procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 663–665. 10.1002/uog.2609 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24Merz E, Abramowicz JS. 3D/4D Ultrasound in Prenatal Diagnosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55: 336–351. 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182446ef7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25Tchirikov M. Successful Tracheal Occlusion Using Ultrathin Fetoscopic Equipment Combined with Real-Time Three-Dimensional Ultrasound. Eur Surg Res 2009; 43: 204–207. 10.1159/000224146 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 26DeVore GR, Falkensammer P, Sklansky MS, Platt LD. Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC): new technology for evaluation of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 380–387. 10.1002/uog.217 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 27Tworetzky W, Wilkins-Haug L, Jennings RW, van der Velde ME, Marshall AC, Marx GR, Colan SD, Benson CB, Lock JE, Perry SB. Balloon Dilation of Severe Aortic Stenosis in the Fetus. Circulation 2004; 110: 2125–2131. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144357.29279.54 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28Patel ND, Nageotte S, Ing FF, Armstrong AK, Chmait R, Detterich JA, Galindo A, Gardiner H, Grinenco S, Herberg U, Jaeggi E, Morris SA, Oepkes D, Simpson JM, Moon-Grady A, Pruetz JD. Procedural, pregnancy, and short-term outcomes after fetal aortic valvuloplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 96: 626–632. 10.1002/ccd.28846 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29Araujo Júnior E, Rolo LC, Simioni C, Nardozza LMM, da Rocha LA, Martins WP, Moron AF. Comparison between multiplanar and rendering modes in the assessment of fetal atrioventricular valve areas by 3D/4D ultrasonography. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2012; 27: 472–476. 10.5935/1678-9741.20120079 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 30Morgan A, Goodman D, Vinagolu-Baur J, Cass I. Prenatal telemedicine during COVID-19: patterns of use and barriers to access. JAMIA Open 2022; 5: ooab116. 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab116 PubMedGoogle Scholar 31Chan FY. Fetal tele-ultrasound and tele-therapy. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13: 167–171. 10.1258/135763307780908030 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 32Smith VJ, Marshall A, Lie MLS, Bidmead E, Beckwith B, Van Oudgaarden E, Robson SC. Implementation of a fetal ultrasound telemedicine service: women's views and family costs. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2021; 21: 38. 10.1186/s12884-020-03532-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 33Masseli G, Cozzi D, Ceccanti S, Laghi F, Giancotti A, Brunelli R. Fetal body MRI for fetal and perinatal management. Clin Radiol 2021; 76: 708. e1–8. PubMedGoogle Scholar 34Wilson RD. Prenatal evaluation for fetal surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 187–193. 10.1097/00001703-200204000-00013 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35Sepulveda W, Wong AE, Sepulveda F, Martinez-Ten P, Ximenes R. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in clinical practice: General aspects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 26: 575–591. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.05.010 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36Kawahara D, Nagata Y. T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI image synthesis with convolutional generative adversarial networks. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26: 35–42. 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0005 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 37Salomon LJ, Sonigo P, Ou P, Ville Y, Brunelle F. Real-time fetal magnetic resonance imaging for the dynamic visualization of the pouch in esophageal atresia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 471–474. 10.1002/uog.7339 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 38Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros Jr RK. Guidelines for Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 333–340. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318180a505 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 39 Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e210–e216. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 40Sadro CT, Dubinsky TJ. CT in pregnancy: Risks and benefits. Applied Radiology. 2013. https://www.appliedradiology.com/communities/Pediatric-Imaging/ct-in-pregnancy-risks-and-benefits [Accessed 8 May 2022]. Google Scholar 41Macedo MP, Werner H, Araujo Júnior E. Fetal skeletal dysplasias: a new way to look at them. Radiol Bras 2020; 53: 112–113. 10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0140 PubMedGoogle Scholar 42Gorincour G, Chaumoitre K, Bourliere-Najean B, Bretelle F, Sigaudy S, D'Ercole C, Philip N, Potier A, Petit P, Panuel M. Fetal skeletal computed tomography: When? How? Why? Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95: 1045–1053. 10.1016/j.diii.2014.04.014 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 43Ruano R, Molho M, Ville Y. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias by combining two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound and intrauterine three-dimensional helical computer tomography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 134–140. 10.1002/uog.1113 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 44Krakow D. Skeletal dysplasias. Clin Perinatol 2015; 42: 301–319. 10.1016/j.clp.2015.03.003 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 45Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Sarpourian F, Shafiei E. Virtual reality applications to assist pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21: 249. 10.1186/s12884-021-03725-5 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 46Juhnke B, Mattson AR, Saltzman D, Azakie A, Hoggard E, Ambrose M, A laizzo P, Erdman A, Fischer G. Use of virtual reality for pre-surgical planning in separation of conjoined twins: A case report. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2019; 233: 1327–1332. 10.1177/0954411919878067 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 47Javaux A, Bouget D, Gruijthuijsen C, Stoyanov D, Vercauteren T, Ourselin S, Deprest J, Denis K, Vander Poorten E. A mixed-reality surgical trainer with comprehensive sensing for fetal laser minimally invasive surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2018; 13: 1949–1957. 10.1007/s11548-018-1822-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 48Werner Jr H, Lopes Dos Santos JR, Fontes R, Belmonte S, Daltro P, Gasparetto E, Marchiori E, Campbell S. Virtual bronchoscopy for evaluating cervical tumors of the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 90–94. 10.1002/uog.11162 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 49Tonni G, Ruano R, Sà R, Peixoto Filho FM, Lopes J, Werner H. 3D Virtual Broncoscopy before FETO Procedure in a Fetus with Severe, Isolated Left Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2018; 37: 134–139. 10.1080/15513815.2018.1445148 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 50Parthasarathy J, Krishnamurthy R, Ostendorf A, Shinoka T, Krishnamurthy R. 3D Printing with MRI in Pediatric Applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51: 1641–1658. 10.1002/jmri.26870 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 51Werner H, Rolo LC, Araujo Júnior E, Dos Santos JRL. Manufacturing Models of Fetal Malformations Built From 3-Dimensional Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Computed Tomography Scan Data. Ultrasound Q 2014; 30; 69–75. 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000048 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 52Chen SA, Ong CS, Hibino N, Garcia JR, Miller JL. 3D printing of fetal heart using 3D ultrasound imaging data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 808–809. 10.1002/uog.19166 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 53Ruano R. Prenatal regenerative fetoscopic interventions for congenital anomalies. BMJ 2020; 370: m1624. 10.1136/bmj.m1624 PubMedGoogle Scholar 54Smajdor A. Ethical challenges in fetal surgery. J Med Ethics 2011; 37: 88–91. 10.1136/jme.2010.039537 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 55Sen S, Patil S, Cornett EM, Prabhakar A, Novitch M, Kaye AD, Fox CJ. Fetal Surgery and Robotic Surgery. In Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery, AD Kaye, RD Urman (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2017; 200–209. 10.1017/9781316534229.019 Google Scholar 56Begovic D. Maternal-Fetal Surgery: Does Recognising Fetal Patienthood Pose a Threat to Pregnant Women's Autonomy? Health Care Analysis 2021; 29: 301–318. 10.1007/s10728-021-00440-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 57Wójcicki P, Drozdowski PH. In utero surgery–current state of the art–part II. Med Sci Monit 2011; 17: RA262–270. 10.12659/MSM.882117 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 58Adzick NS. Prospects for fetal surgery. Early Hum Dev 2013; 89: 881–886. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.09.010 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 59Sampat K, Losty PD. Fetal Surgery. Br J Surg 2021; 108: 632–637. 10.1093/bjs/znaa153 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 60Nassr AA, Erfani H, Fisher JE, Ogunleye OK, Espinoza J, Belfort MA, Shamshirsaz AA. Fetal interventional procedures and surgeries: a practical approach. J Perinat Med 2018; 46: 701–715. 10.1515/jpm-2017-0015 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 61Maselli KM, Badillo A. Advances in fetal surgery. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4: 394. 10.21037/atm.2016.10.34 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 62Ralston SJ, Craigo SD. Ultrasound-guided procedures for prenatal diagnosis and therapy Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2004; 31: 101–123. 10.1016/S0889-8545(03)00124-4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 63Ville Y, Hecher K, Gagnon A, Sebire N, Hyett J, Nicolaides K. Endoscopic laser coagulation in the management of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. BJOG 1998; 105: 446–453. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10132.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 64Kurtz MP, Koh CJ, Jamail GA, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Shamshirsaz AA, Espinoza J, Cass DL, Olutoye OO, Olutoye OA, Braun MC, Roth DR, Belfort MA, Ruano R. Factors associated with fetal shunt dislodgement in lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36: 720–725. 10.1002/pd.4850 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 65Pickard SS, Wong JB, Bucholz EM, Newburger JW, Tworetzky W, Lafranchi T, Benson CB, Wilkins-Haug LE, Porras D, Callahan R, Friedman KG. Fetal Aortic Valvuloplasty for Evolving Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020; 13: e006127. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006127 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 66Luks FI. Requirements for fetal surgery: the diaphragmatic hernia model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 92: 115–118. 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00434-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 67Morris RK, Malin GL, Quinlan-Jones E, Middleton LJ, Hemming K, Burke D, Daniels JP, Khan KS, Deeks J, Kilby MD. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1496–1506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60992-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 68Vinit N, Gueneuc A, Bessières B, Dreux S, Heidet L, Salomon R, Lapillonne A, De Barnardis G, Salomon LJ, Stirnemann JJ, Banc T, Ville Y. Fetal Cystoscopy and Vesicoamniotic Shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction: Long Term Outcome and Current Technical Limitations. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019; 47: 74–83. 10.1159/000500569 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 69Ruano R, Sananes N, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Hernandez-Ruano S, Moog R, Becmeur F, Zaloszyc A, Giron AM, Morin B, Favre R. Fetal intervention for severe lower urinary tract obstruction: a multicenter case–control study comparing fetal cystoscopy with vesicoamniotic shunting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 452–458. 10.1002/uog.14652 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 70Morris RK, Khan KS, Kilby MD. Vesicoamniotic shunting for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: an overview. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F166–F168. 10.1136/adc.2006.099820 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 71Debska M, Kretowicz P, Oledzka A, Gastol P, Dangel J, Swiatkowska-Freund M, Debski R. Early vesico-amniotic shunting — does it change the prognosis in fetal lower urinary tract obstruction diagnosed in the first trimester? Ginekologia Polska 2017; 88: 486–491. 10.5603/GP.a2017.0089 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 72Mallmann MR, Graham V, Rösing B, Gottschalk I, Müller A, Gembruch U, Geipel A, Berg C. Thoracoamniotic Shunting for Fetal Hydrothorax: Predictors of Intrauterine Course and Postnatal Outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2017; 41: 58–65. 10.1159/000446110 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 73Takahashi Y, Kawabata I, Sumie M, Nakata M, Ishii N, Murakoshi T, Katsuragi S, Ikeda T, Saito M, Kawamoto H, Hayashi S, Sago H. Thoracoamniotic shunting for fetal pleural effusions using a double-basket shunt. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1282–1287. 10.1002/pd.3994 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 74Lindenburg ITM, van Kamp IL, Oepkes D. Intrauterine Blood Transfusion: Current Indications and Associated Risks. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 263–271. 10.1159/000362812 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 75Rodeck CH, Nicolaides KH, Warsof SL, Fysh WJ, Gamsu HR, Kemp JR. The management of severe rhesus isoimmunization by fetoscopic intravascular transfusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 769–774. 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90683-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 76Liley AW. Intrauterine Transfusion Of Foetus In Haemolytic Disease. Br Med J 1963; 2: 1107–1109. 10.1136/bmj.2.5365.1107 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 77Ruano R, de A Pimenta EJ, Marques da Silva M, Maksoud JG, Zugaib M. Percutaneous intrauterine laser ablation of the abnormal vessel in pulmonary sequestration with hydrops at 29 weeks' gestation. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1235–1241. 10.7863/jum.2007.26.9.1235 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 78Ruano R, da Silva MM, Salustiano EM, Kilby MD, Tannuri U, Zugaib M. Percutaneous laser ablation under ultrasound guidance for fetal hyperechogenic microcystic lung lesions with hydrops: a single center cohort and a literature review. Prenat Diagn 2012 31: 1127–1132. 10.1002/pd.3969 Google Scholar 79Cruz-Martinez R, Martínez-Rodríguez M, Bermúdez-Rojas M, Magaña-Abarca C, Narvaez-Dominguez V, Rojas-Macedo A, Bautista-García N, Alcocer-Alcocer M. Fetal laser ablation of feeding artery of cystic lung lesions with systemic arterial blood supply. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 744–750. 10.1002/uog.16011 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 80Litwińska M, Litwińska E, Janiak K, Piaseczna-Piotrowska A, Szaflik K. Percutaneous Intratumor Laser Ablation for Fetal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020; 47: 138–144. 10.1159/000500775 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 81Mahieu-Caputo D, Dommergues M, Delezoide A-L, Lacoste M, Cai Y, Narcy F, Jolly D, Gonzales M, Dumez Y, Gubler M-C. Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: Role of the Fetal Renin-Angiotensin System. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 629–636. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64767-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 82Stirnemann J, Slaghekke F, Khalek N, Winer N, Johnson A, Lewi L, Massoud M, Bussieres L, Aegerter P, Hecher K, Senat M-V, Ville Y. Intrauterine fetoscopic laser surgery versus expectant management in stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an international randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224: 528. e1–12. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 83Abdel-Sattar M, Platt LD, DeVore G, Porto M, Benirschke K, Chmait RH. Treatment of Complicated Spontaneous Twin Anemia-Polycythemia Sequence via Fetoscopic Laser Ablation of the Vascular Communications. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; 38: 233–237. 10.1159/000362271 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 84Ruano R, Rodo C, Peiro JL, Shamshirsaz AA, Haeri S, Nomura ML, Salustiano EMA, de Andrade KK, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Carreras E, Belfort MA. Fetoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses in twin–twin transfusion syndrome using 'Solomon technique'. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 434–439. 10.1002/uog.12492 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 85Deprest JA, Benachi A, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH, Berg C, Persico N, Belfort M, Gardener GJ, Ville Y, Johnson A, Morini F, Wielgoś M, Van Calster B, DeKoninck PLJ. Randomized Trial of Fetal Surgery for Moderate Left Diaphragmatic Hernia. New Engl J Med 2021; 385: 119–129. 10.1056/NEJMoa2026983 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 86Ruano R, Yoshisaki CT, da Silva MM, Ceccon ME, Grasi MS, Tannuri U, Zugaib M. A randomized controlled trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion versus postnatal management of severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 20–27. 10.1002/uog.10142 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 87Van der Veeken L, Russo FM, De Catte L, Gratacos E, Benachi A, Ville Y, Nicolaides KH, Berg C, Gardener G, Persico N, Bagolan P, Ryan G, Belfort MA, Deprest J. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and reestablishment of fetal airways for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Gynecol Surg 2018; 15: 9. 10.1186/s10397-018-1041-9 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 88Deprest J, Jani J, Gratacos E, Vandecruys H, Naulaers G, Delgado J, Greenough A, Nicolaides K. Fetal intervention for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the European experience. Semin Perinatol 2005; 29: 94–103. 10.1053/j.semperi.2005.04.006 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 89Minella C, Costantino B, Ruano R, Koch A, Weingertner AS, Favre R, Sananes N. Fetoscopic Release of Amniotic Band Syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 40: 1039–1048. 10.1002/jum.15480 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 90Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Phillips J, Kalter CS, Angel JL. In utero lysis of amniotic bands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 316–320. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10050316.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 91Sananes N, Cruz-Martinez R, Favre R, Orodorica-Flores R, Moog R, Zaloszy A, Giron AM, Ruano R. Two-year outcomes after diagnostic and therapeutic fetal cystoscopy for lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36: 297–303. 10.1002/pd.4771 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 92Ruano R, Duarte S, Bunduki V, Giron AM, Srougi M, Zugaib M. Fetal cystoscopy for severe lower urinary tract obstruction - intial experience of a single center. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 30–39. 10.1002/pd.2418 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 93Belfort MA, Whitehead WE, Shamshirsaz AA, Bateni ZH, Olutoye OO, Olutoye OA, Mann DG, Espinoza J, Williams E, Lee TC, Keswani SG, Ayres N, Cassady CI, Mehollin-Ray AR, Sanz Cortes M, Carreras E, Peiro JL, Ruano R, Cass DL. Fetoscopic Open Neural Tube Defect Repair: Development and Refinement of a Two-Port, Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Technique. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129; 734–743. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001941 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 94Pedreira DAL, Reece EA, Chmait RH, Kontopoulos EV, Quintero RA. Fetoscopic repair of spina bifida: safer and better? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 141–147. 10.1002/uog.15987 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 95Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for spina bifida: past, present, future. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22: 10–17. 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.10.003 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 96Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, Howell LJ, Farrell JA, Dabrowiak ME, Sutton LN, Gupta N, Tulipan NB, D'Alton ME, Farmer DL; MOMS Investigators. A Randomized Trial of Prenatal versus Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningocele. New Engl J Med 2011; 364: 993–1004. 10.1056/NEJMoa1014379 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 97Adzick NS. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 1–8. 10.1016/j.siny.2009.05.003 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 98Pietersma CS, Mulders AGMGJ, Moolenaar LM, Hunink MGM, Koning AHJ, Willemsen SP, Go ATJI, Steegers EAP, Rousian M. First trimester anomaly scan using virtual reality (VR FETUS study): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 515. 10.1186/s12884-020-03180-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 99Shelmerdine SC, Simcock IC, Hutchinson JC, Hutchinson JC, Aughwane R, Melbourne A, Nikitichev DI, Ong JL, Borghi A, Cole G. 3D printing from microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) in human specimens: education and future implications. Br J Radiol 2018; 91: 20180306. 10.1259/bjr.20180306 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 100Sandrini C, Lombardi C, Shearn AIU, Ordonez MV, Caputo M, Presti F, Luciani GB, Rossetti L, Biglino G. Three-Dimensional Printing of Fetal Models of Congenital Heart Disease Derived From Microfocus Computed Tomography: A Case Series. Front Pediatr 2020; 7: 567. 10.3389/fped.2019.00567 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 101Nicot R, Couly G, Ferri J, Levaillant JM. Three-dimensional printed haptic model from a prenatal surface-rendered oropalatal sonographic view: a new tool in the surgical planning of cleft lip/palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018: 47: 44–47. 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.005 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 102Werner H, Ribeiro G, Arcoverde V, Lopes J, Velho L. The use of metaverse in fetal medicine and gynecology. Eur J Radiol 2022; 150: 110241. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110241 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 103Baken L, van Gruting IM, Steegers EA, van der Spek PJ, Exalto N, Koning AH. Design and validation of a 3D virtual reality desktop system for sonographic length and volume measurements in early pregnancy evaluation. J Clin Ultrasound 2015; 43: 164–170. 10.1002/jcu.22207 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 104Luks FI, Carr SR, Feit LR, Rubin LP. Experience with a multidisciplinary antenatal diagnosis and management model in fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 14: 333–337. 10.1080/jmf.14.5.333.337 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 105dos Santos JRL, Werner H, Azevedo B, Lanziotti L, Portari EA, Paciornik S, Alves H. 3D-Printed Models Applied in Medical Research Studies. In New Trends in 3D Printing, I Shishkovsky (ed). IntechOpen: London, 2016. 10.5772/63942 Google Scholar 106Skalidis I, Muller O, Fournier S. CardioVerse: The cardiovascular medicine in the era of Metaverse. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2023; 33: 471–476. 10.1016/j.tcm.2022.05.004 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 107Codsi E, Audibert F. Fetal Surgery: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019; 41: S287–S289. 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.039 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 108Bergh E, Buskmiller C, Johnson A. The Future of Fetal Surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North America 2021; 48: 745–758. 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.06.004 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Volume63, Issue3March 2024Pages 303-311 ReferencesRelatedInformation