Plant extracts, polymers and new approach methods: Practical experience with skin sensitization assessment

Susanne N Kolle, Melanie Flach,Marcus Kleber,David A Basketter,Britta Wareing,Annette Mehling, Lars Hareng, Nico Watzek, Steffen Bade, Dorothee Funk-Weyer,Robert Landsiedel

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology(2023)

引用 2|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
Over the last decade, research into methodologies to identify skin sensitization hazards has led to the adoption of several non-animal methods as OECD test guidelines. However, predictive accuracy beyond the chemical domains of the individual validation studies remains largely untested. In the present study, skin sensitization test results from in vitro and in chemico methods for 12 plant extracts and 15 polymeric materials are reported and compared to available in vivo skin sensitization data. Eight plant extracts were tested in the DPRA and h-CLAT, with the 2 out of 3 approach resulting in a balanced accuracy of 50%. The balanced accuracy for the 11 plant extracts assessed in the SENS-IS was 88%. Excluding 5 polymers inconclusive in vitro, the remainder, assessed using the 2 out of 3 approach, resulted in 63% balanced accuracy. The SENS-IS method, excluding one polymeric material due to technical inapplicability, showed 68% balanced accuracy. Although based on limited numbers, the results presented here indicate that some substance subgroups may not be in the applicability domains of the method used and careful analysis is required before positive or negative results can be accepted.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Plant extract,Polymer,Skin sensitization,In vitro alternatives,Defined approach,Applicability domain,DPRA,LuSens,h-CLAT,mMUSST,SENS-IS,2 out of 3 approach
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要