Subtle magnetic resonance imaging differences in tegmental pilocytic astrocytomas as a caution against attempting gross-total resection: illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND:Although surgery within the tegmentum of the midbrain is challenging, resection of tegmental pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) is a standard treatment because this has been shown to outperform chemotherapy and radiotherapy in terms of long-term tumor control. Gross total resection (GTR) assisted by intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring can be achieved with a reasonable risk-to-benefit ratio, especially for well-circumscribed tumors, but careful scrutiny of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical to surgical decision making. The authors present two cases of tegmental PAs, which appeared grossly similar on MRI and were operated on via the same surgical approach using the same intraoperative adjuncts. OBSERVATIONS:The tumors had identical histopathological and molecular diagnoses but drastically different functional outcomes for the patients, with significant long-term complications for one of the children, which the authors believe was due to a slightly more invasive nature of this tumor. The authors demonstrate subtle preoperative MRI findings that might be potential clues to a more infiltrative nature of one PA versus another and present pathological findings supporting this argument. LESSONS:This report serves as a reminder that not all tegmental PAs can be managed by the same surgical approach. Subtle signs of infiltration may indicate that GTR should not be attempted.