Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Chinese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory of LEPUS

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA(2023)

引用 1|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
LEPUS showed significant efficacy benefits with daratumumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-Vd) versus Vd for Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). With similar to 2 years' median follow-up, D-Vd continued to prolong progression-free survival and achieve higher complete response or better rates with consistent safety, further supporting the use of D-Vd as a standard of care in Chinese patients with RRMM.Background: In the phase 3 LEPUS study, daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit versus Vd alone in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety results from LEPUS.Patients and Methods: Chinese patients with >= 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 2:1 to bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for eight cycles +/- daratu-mumab (16 mg/kg) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In total, 211 patients were randomized to D-Vd (n = 141) or Vd (n = 70). At a 25.1-month median follow-up, D-Vd prolonged PFS versus Vd (median, 14.8 vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.51; P < .00001). PFS benefit of D-Vd versus Vd was maintained across prespecified subgroups, including patients with prior bortezomib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53), patients who were refractory to last prior line of therapy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65), and patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71). Overall response rate (84.7% vs.66.7%; P = .00314) and rates of very good partial response or better (71.5% vs. 34.9%; P < .00001) and complete response or better (40.1% vs 14.3%; P = .00016) were higher with D-Vd versus Vd. No new safety concerns were identified.Conclusions: In this updated analysis, D-Vd maintained significant efficacy benefits versus Vd alone and demonstrated a consistent safety profile, fur ther suppor ting the use of D-Vd as a standard of care in Chinese patients with RRMM.
更多
查看译文
关键词
CD38,monoclonal antibody,efficacy,safety,Asian
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要