Background: Manual muscle testing is a mainstay of strength assessment despite not having been compared with intraoperative electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves.Methods: Intraoperative electrical stimulation served as the reference standard in evaluating predictive accuracy of the Active Movement Scale (AMS) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Retrospective consecutive sampling of all patients with AFM who underwent exploration or nerve transfer at a pediatric multidisciplinary brachial plexus and peripheral nerve center from March of 2016 to July of 2020 were included. The nonparametric area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Optimal cutoff score (Youden J ) and diagnostic accuracy values were reported. The AMS and MRC scale were directly compared for predictive superiority.Results: A total of 181 upper extremity nerves (73 donor nerve candidates and 108 recipient nerve candidates) were tested intraoperatively from 40 children (mean age +/- SD, 7.9 +/- 4.9 years). The scales performed similarly ( P = 0.953) in classifying suitable donor nerves with satisfactory accuracy (AUC AMS , 71.5%; AUC MRC , 70.7%; optimal cutoff, AMS >5 and MRC >2). The scales performed similarly ( P = 0.688) in classifying suitable recipient nerves with good accuracy (AUC AMS , 92.1%; AUC MRC :, 94.9%; optimal cutoff, AMS <= 3 and MRC <= 1).Conclusions: Manual muscle testing is an accurate, noninvasive means of identifying donor and recipient nerves for transfer in children with acute flaccid myelitis. The utility of these results is in minimizing unexpected findings in the operating room and aiding in the development of contingency plans. Further research may extend these findings to test the validity of manual muscle testing as an outcome measure of the success of nerve transfer.
