Upper cervical spine fracture patterns and blunt cerebrovascular injuries

Purpose To determine patterns of C1 and C2 vertebral fractures that are associated with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). Methods Retrospective chart review of clinical and imaging reports at a level 1 trauma center over 10 consecutive years was conducted in patients with C1 and C2 fractures. Student t -test and chi-squared analyses were used to determine associations between fracture levels and fracture types with the presence of BCVI on CTA and/or MRI or stroke on CT and/or MRI. Results Multilevel fractures were associated with higher incidence of BCVI compared to isolated C1 or C2 fractures ( p < 0.01), but not with stroke ( p = 0.16). There was no difference in incidence of BCVI or stroke between isolated C1 and isolated C2 fractures ( p = 0.46, p = 0.25). Involvement of the transverse foramen (TF) alone was not associated with BCVI or stroke ( p = 0.10–0.40, p = 0.34–0.43). However, TF fractures that were comminuted or contained fracture fragment(s) were associated with increased BCVI ( p < 0.01, p = 0.02), though not with stroke ( p = 0.11, p = 0.09). In addition, high-energy mechanism of injury was also associated with BCVI ( p < 0.01) and stroke ( p < 0.01). Conclusion C1 and C2 fractures are associated with BCVI in the presence of high-energy mechanism of injury, concomitant fractures of other cervical vertebral body levels, comminuted TF fractures, or TF fractures with internal fragments. Attention to these fracture parameters is important in evaluating C1 and C2 fractures for BCVI.