Use of Moses 2.0 with extended frequency and optimized Moses vs. high-power laser in MiniPCNL: a randomized controlled trial

Esteban Emiliani,Andres Koey Kanashiro,Josep Balaña, Sofía Fontanet, Julia Aumatell,Julio Calderón-Cortez, Juan Iregui-Parra,Antoni Sanchez-Pui, Francisco Sanchez-Martin,Felix Millan,Oriol Angerri

Urolithiasis(2023)

引用 1|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare standard high-power laser (with < 80 Hz) to extended frequency (> 100 Hz) lithotripsy during miniPCNL. 40 patients were randomized in to two groups undergoing MiniPCNL. For both groups, the Holmium Pulse laser Moses 2.0 (Lumenis) was used. For group A, standard high-power laser with < 80 Hz, with Moses distance was set using up to 3 J. For Group B, extended frequency (100–120 Hz) was used allowing up to 0.6 J. All patients underwent MiniPCNL using an 18 Fr balloon access. Demographics were comparable between groups. Mean stone diameter was 19 mm (14–23) with no differences between groups ( p = 0.14). Mean operative time was 91 and 87 min for group A and B ( p = 0.71), mean laser time was similar in both groups, 6.5 min and 7.5 min, respectively ( p = 0.52) as well as the number of laser activations during the surgery ( p = 0.43). Mean Watts used was 18 and 16 respectively being similar in both groups ( p = 0.54) as well as the total KJoules ( p = 0.29). Endoscopic vision was good in all surgeries. The endoscopic and radiologic stone free rate was achieved in all patients expect for two in both groups ( p = 0.72). Two Clavien I complications were seen, a small bleeding for group A and a small pelvic perforation in group B. The use of high-power holmium laser with extended frequency and optimized Moses was effective and safe being comparable to standard high-power laser for MiniPCNL allowing more versatility with the setting range.
更多
查看译文
关键词
MiniPCNL,Holmium laser,Moses,Moses 2.0
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要