The Association of QRS Duration with Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Sex- and Race- Based Subgroups: The Dallas Heart Study

Introduction: We explored sex and race differences in the prognostic implications of QRS prolongation among healthy adults. Methods: Participants from the Dallas Heart Study (DHS) free of cardiovascular (CV) disease who underwent ECG testing and cMRI evaluation were included. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the cross-sectional association of QRS duration with left ventricular (LV) mass, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV). Association of QRS duration with risk of MACE was evaluated using Cox models. Interaction testing was performed between QRS duration and sex/race respectively for each outcome of interest. QRS duration was log transformed. Results: The study included 2,785 participants. Longer QRS duration was associated with higher LV mass, lower LVEF, and higher LVEDV, independent of CV risk factors ([?: 0.21, P<0.001], [?: -0.13, P<0.001], [?: 0.22, P<0.001] respectively). Men with longer QRS duration were more likely to have higher LV mass and higher LVEDV compared to women (P-int=0.012, P-int=0.01, respectively). Black participants with longer QRS duration were more likely to have higher LV mass as compared to White participants (P-int<0.001). In Cox analysis, QRS prolongation was associated with higher risk of MACE in women (HR = 6.66 [95% CI: 2.32, 19.1]) but not men. This association was attenuated after adjustment for CV risk factors, with a trend toward significance (HR = 2.45 [95% CI: 0.94, 6.39]). Longer QRS duration was not associated with risk of MACE in Black or White participants in the adjusted models. No interaction between sex/race and QRS duration for risk of MACE was observed. Discussion: In healthy adults, QRS duration is differentially associated with abnormalities in LV structure and function. These findings inform the use of QRS duration in identifying subgroups at risk for CV disease, and caution against using QRS duration cut offs uniformly for clinical decision making. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement Funding: The Dallas Heart Study was supported by a grant from the Reynolds Foundation and grant UL1TR001105 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved the protocol for DHS-1 I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes The data referred to in the manuscript is available by request to the Dallas Heart Study